首页> 外文期刊>ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research >Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of viscosupplementation with hylan G-F 20 for knee and hip osteoarthritis
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of viscosupplementation with hylan G-F 20 for knee and hip osteoarthritis

机译:Hylan G-F 20增粘剂治疗膝关节和髋部骨关节炎的成本效益和预算影响分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: To estimate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of viscosupplementation with one intra-articular (IA) injection of 6 mL hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-Onesup?,/sup) and with three injections of 2 mL hylan G-F 20 (Synviscsup?,/sup3×2) in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients compared with conventional support therapy (CST – eg, NSAIDs and acetaminophen) and the cost-effectiveness of one IA injection of 2 mL hylan G-F 20 (Synviscsup?,/sup1×2) in hip OA patients compared with CST from an Italian Health System perspective. Methods: The model used was a Markov model with states for stages II–IV on the Kellgren–Lawrence scale and runs on 6-month cycles over a 5-year time horizon. A 3.5% discount was applied to both costs and utilities. Direct costs were determined from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. A one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted for both comparisons. Results: Hylan G-F 20 1×6 mL and hylan G-F 20 3×2 mL for knee OA were very likely to be cost-effective when compared to acetaminophen (ICER = €3,160.61 and €3,845.81 per QALY, respectively) and NSAIDs as both ICERs are below €25,000. The hip OA treatment by hylan G-F 20 1×2 mL was dominant compared to NSAIDs and very likely compared to acetaminophen. The results of the cost-effectiveness analysis were confirmed by one-way sensitivity analysis. The budget impact analysis for knee and hip OA showed a small increase in expenditure during 5 years. Conclusions: Hylan G-F 20 1×6 mL/hylan G-F 20 is a cost-effectiveness treatment compared to NSAIDs and acetaminophen in the treatment of knee/hip OA in Italy. The treatment of hip and knee OA resulted in cost-saving with hylan G-F 20 1×2 mL and economically sustainable with hylan G-F 20 1×6 mL. However, Real Word Evidence studies should be conducted in order to estimate costs associated with both prosthetics and to understand the reduction of physiotherapy and medication due to hylan G-F 20.
机译:目的:估算一次关节内(IA)注射6 mL Hylan GF 20(Synvisc-One ?)和三次注射2 mL Hylan进行粘膜补充的成本效益和预算影响与常规支持疗法(CST – NSAIDs和对乙酰氨基酚)相比,膝骨关节炎(OA)患者的GF 20(Synvisc ?, 3×2)和一次IA注射2 mL的成本效益从意大利卫生系统的角度来看,髋部OA患者与CST相比,hylan GF 20(Synvisc ?, 1×2)。方法:所使用的模型是马尔可夫模型,其状态处于Kellgren-Lawrence量表的II–IV期,并在5年的时间范围内以6个月的周期运行。成本和公用事业费用均享有3.5%的折扣。直接费用是从意大利国家卫生局的角度确定的。两种比较均进行了单向概率概率分析。结果:与对乙酰氨基酚(ICER =每个QALY分别为3,160.61欧元和3,845.81欧元)和NSAIDs均作为两种ICER相比,用于膝部OA的Hylan GF 20 1×6 mL和Hylan GF 20 3×2 mL非常有成本效益。低于25,000欧元。与NSAIDs相比,hylan G-F 20 1×2 mL对髋骨OA的治疗占主导地位,与对乙酰氨基酚相比,很有可能。通过单向敏感性分析确认了成本效益分析的结果。对膝盖和髋骨OA的预算影响分析显示,在5年中支出略有增加。结论:在意大利,与NSAIDs和对乙酰氨基酚相比,Hylan G-F 20 1×6 mL / hylan G-F 20是一种成本效益高的治疗方法。髋和膝骨OA的治疗使用hylan G-F 20 1×2 mL可以节省成本,而使用hylan G-F 20 1×6 mL可以经济地持续。但是,应该进行“实词证据”研究,以估计与假肢相关的费用,并了解由于Hylan G-F 20而导致的理疗和药物治疗的减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号