...
首页> 外文期刊>ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research >Societal savings in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer receiving bevacizumab-based versus non-bevacizumab-based treatments in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain
【24h】

Societal savings in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer receiving bevacizumab-based versus non-bevacizumab-based treatments in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain

机译:在法国,德国,意大利和西班牙接受基于贝伐单抗和非贝伐单抗治疗的晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌晚期患者的社会节省

获取原文

摘要

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the savings accrued using bevacizumab-based treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer from the societal perspective, taking only public costs into account, in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. Methods: Societal costs were estimated by collecting and analyzing labor costs, carer costs, sickness benefits, disability benefits, and home care benefits. Cost inputs were derived from publicly available databases or from the published literature. Expert opinion was only used if no other source was available. Efficacy data from two randomized clinical trials were used. The time horizon in the health economic model was lifetime. Efficacy and costs were discounted by 3.5%. All main model parameters were tested in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: Mean incremental savings to society per patient ranged from €2277 in Italy to €4461 in Germany. The results were most sensitive to the change in proportion of patients working full-time and the proportion of patients who were able to return to work. Conclusion: This analysis shows that bevacizumab-based treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer is associated with more savings to society compared to standard chemotherapy in terms of increased productivity and decreased social benefits paid to patients who are able to work in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是从社会角度研究基于贝伐单抗的非小细胞肺癌治疗节省的费用,并且仅在法国,德国,意大利和西班牙考虑公共费用。方法:通过收集和分析劳动力成本,看护者成本,疾病津贴,残障津贴和家庭护理津贴来估算社会费用。成本输入来自可公开获得的数据库或已公开的文献。仅在没有其他来源可用时才使用专家意见。使用来自两项随机临床试验的功效数据。卫生经济模型中的时间范围是生命周期。效率和成本均降低了3.5%。所有主要模型参数均经过确定性和概率敏感性分析测试。结果:平均每位患者为社会节省的费用从意大利的2277欧元到德国的4461欧元不等。结果对全职工作的患者比例和能够重返工作岗位的患者比例的变化最为敏感。结论:该分析表明,与贝伐单抗相比,在非小细胞肺癌中基于贝伐单抗的治疗可为社会带来更多的节省,在提高生产率和减少可付给在法国,德国工作的患者的社会福利方面,与标准化疗相比,意大利和西班牙。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号