首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Evaluation of femtosecond laser in flap and cap creation in corneal refractive surgery for myopia: a 3-year follow-up
【24h】

Evaluation of femtosecond laser in flap and cap creation in corneal refractive surgery for myopia: a 3-year follow-up

机译:飞秒激光在近视角膜屈光手术中皮瓣和帽盖形成中的评估:三年随访

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate femtosecond laser in flap and cap creation, detect some corneal biomechanical changes, and evaluate dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), FemtoLASIK, and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with 3-year follow-up. Patients and methods: Preoperative evaluation taken: full ophthalmic examination, Pentacam, ocular response analyzer, ocular surface disease index (OSDI), and tear breakup time (TBUT). LASIK flap was created using Moria microkeratome in 30 eyes (LASIK group) and using VisuMax femtosecond laser in 38 eyes (FS-LASIK group) and SMILE was done by VisuMax in 35 eyes (SMILE group). Postoperative evaluation: anterior segment optical coherence tomography to measure flap and cap thickness, ocular response analyzer to measure corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF), OSDI, and TBUT at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. Results: This study included 103 eyes of 103 patients. The mean deviation of central cap or flap thickness from intended was statistically higher in the LASIK group ( P <0.001). Both CH and CRF showed significant reduction postoperatively but were significantly higher in the SMILE group during follow up ( P <0.05). The mean OSDI scores were significantly elevated in all groups postoperatively ( P <0.01) but were significantly lower in the SMILE group 3 months postoperatively ( P <0.05). The mean TBUT was significantly decreased in all groups postoperatively ( P <0.01) but was significantly higher in the SMILE group 6 months postoperatively ( P <0.05). Conclusion: Femtosecond laser is more accurate than microkeratomes. CH and CRF changes were least after SMILE. The three procedures led to significant dryness but for shorter duration with SMILE.
机译:目的:为了评估飞秒激光在瓣和帽形成中的作用,检测一些角膜生物力学变化,并评估激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK),FemtoLASIK和小切口小孔摘除术(SMILE)后的干眼症,并进行3年的随访。患者和方法:术前评估:全面眼科检查,Pentacam,眼反应分析仪,眼表疾病指数(OSDI)和眼泪破裂时间(TBUT)。 LASIK皮瓣是用30眼的Moria微型角膜刀(LASIK组)和38眼的VisuMax飞秒激光(FS-LASIK组)制作的,而35眼的VisuMax(SMILE组)是用SMILE制作的。术后评估:前段光学相干断层扫描术测量皮瓣和帽厚度,眼反应分析仪测量角膜滞后(CH)和角膜抵抗因子(CRF),OSDI和TBUT在1,3,6,6,12,24和36术后几个月。结果:本研究纳入103例患者的103眼。 LASIK组中,中心帽或瓣厚度与预期值的平均偏差在统计学上较高(P <0.001)。术后CH和CRF均显着降低,但在随访期间SMILE组显着升高(P <0.05)。术后3个月,所有组的OSDI平均评分均显着升高(P <0.01),而SMILE组显着降低(P <0.05)。术后6个月,所有组的平均TBUT均显着降低(P <0.01),而在SMILE组中,其平均TBUT显着升高(P <0.05)。结论:飞秒激光比微角膜刀更准确。 CH和CRF变化在SMILE后最少。这三个步骤导致明显的干燥,但使用SMILE的时间较短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号