首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Epidemiology >Effect of glomerular filtration rate at dialysis initiation on survival in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: what is the effect of lead-time bias?
【24h】

Effect of glomerular filtration rate at dialysis initiation on survival in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: what is the effect of lead-time bias?

机译:透析开始时肾小球滤过率对晚期慢性肾脏病患者生存的影响:提前期偏差的影响是什么?

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: Current clinical guidelines recommend to initiate dialysis in the presence of symptoms or signs attributable to kidney failure, often with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 5–10?mL/min/1.73 m2. Little evidence exists about the optimal kidney function to start dialysis. Thus far, most observational studies have been limited by lead-time bias. Only a few studies have accounted for lead-time bias, and showed contradictory results. We examined the effect of GFR at dialysis initiation on survival in chronic kidney disease patients, and the role of lead-time bias therein. We used both kidney function based on 24-hour urine collection (measured GFR [mGFR]) and estimated GFR (eGFR). Materials and methods: A total of 1,143 patients with eGFR data at dialysis initiation and 852 patients with mGFR data were included from the NECOSAD cohort. Cox regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. To examine the effect of lead-time bias, survival was counted from the time of dialysis initiation or from a common starting point (GFR 20 mL/min/1.73 m2), using linear interpolation models. Results: Without lead-time correction, no difference between early and late starters was present based on eGFR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81–1.3). However, after lead-time correction, early initiation showed a survival disadvantage (HR between 1.1 [95% CI 0.82–1.48] and 1.33 [95% CI 1.05–1.68]). Based on mGFR, the potential survival benefit for early starters without lead-time correction (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.62–1.03) completely disappeared after lead-time correction (HR between 0.94 [95% CI 0.65–1.34] and 1.21 [95% CI 0.95–1.56]). Dialysis start time differed about a year between early and late initiation. Conclusion: Lead-time bias is not only a methodological problem but also has clinical impact when assessing the optimal kidney function to start dialysis. Therefore, lead-time bias is extremely important to correct for. Taking account of lead-time bias, this controlled study showed that early dialysis initiation (eGFR >7.9, mGFR >6.6 mL/min/1.73 m2) was not associated with an improvement in survival. Based on kidney function, this study suggests that in some patients, dialysis could be started even later than an eGFR 2.
机译:目的:当前的临床指南建议在存在可归因于肾功能衰竭的症状或体征的情况下开始透析,通常其肾小球滤过率(GFR)为5–10?mL / min / 1.73 m 2 。关于开始透析的最佳肾功能的证据很少。到目前为止,大多数观察性研究都受到前置时间偏差的限制。只有少数研究解释了交付时间偏差,并显示出矛盾的结果。我们检查了透析开始时GFR对慢性肾脏病患者生存的影响,以及其中的前置时间偏向的作用。我们基于24小时尿液收集(测量的GFR [mGFR])和估计的GFR(eGFR)来使用肾脏功能。材料和方法:NECOSAD研究对象共纳入1143例透析开始时有eGFR数据的患者和852例具有mGFR数据的患者。 Cox回归用于调整潜在的混杂因素。为了检查前置时间偏差的影响,使用线性插值模型从透析开始时或从共同起点(GFR 20 mL / min / 1.73 m 2 )开始计算生存时间。结果:没有提前期校正,基于eGFR的早期和晚期启动者之间没有差异(危险比[HR] 1.03,95%置信区间[CI] 0.81–1.3)。但是,在提前期校正后,早期启动显示出生存劣势(HR在1.1 [95%CI 0.82-1.48]和1.33 [95%CI 1.05-1.68]之间。基于mGFR,提前期校正后(HR介于0.94 [95%CI 0.65–1.34]和1.21 [95之间],无需提前期校正(HR 0.8,95%CI 0.62–1.03)的早期启动者的潜在生存优势就完全消失了。 %CI 0.95-1.56])。透析开始时间在早期和晚期之间相差大约一年。结论:提前期偏差不仅是方法上的问题,而且在评估开始透析的最佳肾功能时也具有临床影响。因此,提前期偏差对纠正非常重要。考虑到前置时间偏差,该对照研究表明早期透析开始(eGFR> 7.9,mGFR> 6.6 mL / min / 1.73 m 2 )与生存率改善无关。根据肾脏功能,这项研究表明,某些患者甚至可以在eGFR 2 之后开始透析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号