首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neurosurgery. >Comparison of Patient Outcomes in 3725 Overlapping vs 3633 Nonoverlapping Neurosurgical Procedures Using a Single Institution's Clinical and Administrative Database
【24h】

Comparison of Patient Outcomes in 3725 Overlapping vs 3633 Nonoverlapping Neurosurgical Procedures Using a Single Institution's Clinical and Administrative Database

机译:使用单个机构的临床和管理数据库比较3725例重叠和3633例不重叠的神经外科手术患者结果

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Overlapping surgery is a common practice to improve surgical efficiency, but there are limited data on its safety.OBJECTIVE: To analyze the patient outcomes of overlapping vs nonoverlapping surgeries performed by multiple neurosurgeons.METHODS: Retrospective review of 7358 neurosurgical procedures, 2012 to 2015, at an urban academic hospital. Collected variables: patient age, gender, insurance, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, severity of illness, mortality risk, admission type, transfer source, procedure type, surgery date, number of cosurgeons, presence of neurosurgery resident/fellow/another attending, and overlapping vs nonoverlapping surgery. Outcomes: procedure time, length of stay, estimated blood loss, discharge location, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, return to operating room, acute respiratory failure, and severe sepsis. Statistics: univariate, then multivariate mixed-effect models.RESULTS: Overlapping surgery patients (n = 3725) were younger and had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, severity of illness, and mortality risk (P & .0001) than nonoverlapping surgery patients (n = 3633). Overlapping surgeries had longer procedure times (214 vs 172 min; P & .0001), but shorter length of stay (7.3 vs 7.9 d; P = .010) and lower estimated blood loss (312 vs 363 mL’s; P = .003). Overlapping surgery patients were more likely to be discharged home (73.6% vs 66.2%; P & .0001), and had lower mortality rates (1.3% vs 2.5%; P = .0005) and acute respiratory failure (1.8% vs 2.6%; P = .021). In multivariate models, there was no significant difference between overlapping and nonoverlapping surgeries for any patient outcomes, except for procedure duration, which was longer in overlapping surgery (estimate = 23.03; P & .001).CONCLUSIONS: When planned appropriately, overlapping surgery can be performed safely within the infrastructure at our academic institution.
机译:背景:重叠手术是提高手术效率的普遍做法,但其安全性数据有限。目的:分析由多个神经外科医师进行的重叠与不重叠手术的患者结果。方法:对7358例神经外科手术的回顾性回顾,2012年2015年,在城市学术医院就诊。收集的变量:患者年龄,性别,保险,美国麻醉医师学会评分,疾病严重程度,死亡率风险,入院类型,转诊来源,手术类型,手术日期,同伴医生数量,有神经外科住院医师/同伴/另一主治医师的存在,以及重叠与非重叠手术。结果:手术时间,住院时间,估计失血量,出院地点,30天死亡率,30天再入院,返回手术室,急性呼吸衰竭和严重败血症。统计:单变量,然后是多变量混合效应模型。结果:与非重叠手术患者相比,重叠手术患者(n = 3725)较年轻,美国麻醉医师学会评分,疾病严重程度和死亡率风险(P <.0001)较低(n = 3633)。重叠手术的手术时间更长(214 vs. 172 min; P <.0001),但住院时间更短(7.3 vs 7.9 d; P = .010)和较低的估计失血量(312 vs 363 mL; P = .003) )。重叠手术患者更容易出院(73.6%vs 66.2%; P <.0001),死亡率较低(1.3%vs 2.5%; P = .0005)和急性呼吸衰竭(1.8%vs 2.6) %; P = .021)。在多变量模型中,对于任何患者结果,重叠手术和不重叠手术之间没有显着差异,除了手术时间长(在重叠手术中更长)(估计= 23.03; P <.001)。结论:在适当计划的情况下,重叠手术可以在我们学术机构的基础架构中安全地执行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号