首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Epidemiology >Longer distance to specialized treatment centers does not adversely affect treatment intensity or outcomes in adult acute myeloid leukemia patients. A Danish national population-based cohort study
【24h】

Longer distance to specialized treatment centers does not adversely affect treatment intensity or outcomes in adult acute myeloid leukemia patients. A Danish national population-based cohort study

机译:到专业治疗中心的距离越远,对成人急性髓细胞性白血病患者的治疗强度或预后没有不利影响。丹麦全国人口队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is widely centralized. Longer distances to a specialized treatment center may affect patients’ access to curative-intended treatment. Especially during outpatient treatment, distance may also affect survival. Methods and patients: The authors conducted a national population-based cohort study including all AML patients diagnosed in Denmark between 2000 and 2014. We investigated effects of distance (10 kilometers [km; reference], 10–25, 25–50, 50–100, 100) to the nearest specialized treatment facility on the probability of receiving intensive chemotherapy, HSCT, and achieving a complete remission (CR) using logistic regression analysis (odds ratios; ORs). For overall survival, we used Cox proportional hazards regression (hazard ratios [HRs]) and adjusted (a) for relevant baseline characteristics. Results: Of 2,992 patients (median age=68.5 years), 53% received intensive chemotherapy and 12% received low-dose chemotherapy outpatient regimens. The median distance to a specialized treatment center was 40 km (interquartile range=10–77 km). No impact of distance to specialized treatment centers was seen on the probability of receiving intensive chemotherapy (10–25 km, aOR=1.1 (CI=0.7–1.7), 25–50 km, aOR=1.1 (CI=0.7–1.7), 50–100 km, aOR=1.3 (CI=0.9–1.9), and 100 km, aOR=1.4 [CI=0.9–2.2]). Overall survival in patients regardless of therapy (10 km, aOR=1.0 vs 100 km, aOR=1.0 [CI=0.9–1.2]), in intensive therapy patients, or in patients’ choice of post-remission was not affected by distance to specialized treatment center. Distance to a transplant center also did not affect the probability of HSCT or survival post-HSCT. Conclusion: In Denmark, distance to a specialized treatment facility offering remission-induction chemotherapy and HSCT does not negatively affect access to curative-indented therapy, treatment-response, or survival in AML patients.
机译:背景:急性髓细胞性白血病(AML)的治疗已广泛集中。距专业治疗中心的距离较长,可能会影响患者获得根治性治疗的机会。特别是在门诊治疗期间,距离也可能影响生存。方法和患者:作者进行了一项全国人群队列研究,其中包括2000年至2014年在丹麦诊断出的所有AML患者。我们调查了距离(<10 km [km;参考],10–25、25–50、50 – 100,> 100)到最近的专门治疗机构,以了解接受强化化疗,HSCT并使用逻辑回归分析(优势比; OR)实现完全缓解(CR)的可能性。对于总体生存,我们使用Cox比例风险回归(风险比[HRs])并针对相关基线特征进行了调整(a)。结果:在2,992例患者(中位年龄= 68.5岁)中,有53%接受了强力化疗,而12%接受了小剂量化疗门诊方案。到专门治疗中心的中位距离为40 km(四分位间距= 10–77 km)。到专业治疗中心的距离对接受强化化疗的可能性没有影响(10–25 km,aOR = 1.1(CI = 0.7–1.7),25–50 km,aOR = 1.1(CI = 0.7–1.7), 50-100 km,aOR = 1.3(CI = 0.9-1.9),> 100 km,aOR = 1.4 [CI = 0.9-2.2])。无论采用何种疗法(<10 km,aOR = 1.0对比> 100 km,aOR = 1.0 [CI = 0.9–1.2]),强化治疗患者或缓解后患者的选择,总生存率均不受以下因素的影响距专科治疗中心的距离。到移植中心的距离也不会影响HSCT或HSCT后生存的可能性。结论:在丹麦,距离提供缓解诱导化学疗法和HSCT的专门治疗机构的距离不会对AML患者获得根治性疗法,治疗反应或生存产生负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号