首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurement by Sirius? Scheimpflug tomography and ultrasound
【24h】

Central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurement by Sirius? Scheimpflug tomography and ultrasound

机译:天狼星测量角膜中央厚度和前房深度Scheimpflug断层扫描和超声检查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the new Sirius? Scheimpflug anterior segment examination device for measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) with that of CCT measurements obtained by ultrasound pachymetry and ACD measurements obtained by ultrasound biometry, respectively.Methods: CCT and ACD was measured in 50 right eyes from 50 healthy subjects using a Sirius Scheimpflug camera, SP100 ultrasound pachymetry, and US800 ultrasound biometry.Results: CCT measured with the Sirius was 546 ± 39 μm and 541 ± 35 μm with SP100 ultrasound pachymetry (P = 0.003). The difference was statistically significant (mean difference 4.68 ± 10.5 μm; limits of agreement ?15.8 to 25.20 μm). ACD measured with the Sirius was 2.96 ± 0.3 mm compared with 3.36 ± 0.29 mm using US800 ultrasound biometry (P < 0.001). The difference was statistically significant (mean difference ?0.40 ± 0.16 mm; limits of agreement ?0.72 to 0.07 mm). When the ACD values obtained using ultrasound biometry were corrected according to the values for CCT measured by ultrasound, the agreement increased significantly between both technologies for ACD measurements (mean difference 0.15 ± 0.16 mm; limits of agreement ?0.16 to 0.45 mm).Conclusion: CCT and ACD measured by Sirius and ultrasound methods showing good agreement between repeated measurements obtained in the same subjects (repeatability) with either instrument. However, CCT and ACD values, even after correcting ultrasound ACD by subtracting the CCT value obtained with either technology should not be used interchangeably.
机译:背景:这项研究的目的是比较新天狼星的准确性。 Scheimpflug前段检查装置分别用于测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)和前房深度(ACD),分别通过超声测厚法获得的CCT测量值和通过超声生物测定法获得的ACD测量值。方法:在50个右眼中测量CCT和ACD使用Sirius Scheimpflug相机,SP100超声波测厚仪和US800超声波生物测定法对来自50名健康受试者的眼睛进行结果。结果:使用SP100超声波测厚仪,使用Sirius测得的CCT为546±39μm和541±35μm(P = 0.003)。差异具有统计学意义(平均差异为4.68±10.5μm;一致限为±15.8至25.20μm)。 Sirius测得的ACD为2.96±0.3 mm,而US800超声生物测定法测得的ACD为3.36±0.29 mm(P <0.001)。差异具有统计学意义(平均差异≤0.40±0.16 mm;一致性极限≤0.72至0.07 mm)。当根据超声测量的CCT值校正使用超声生物测定法获得的ACD值时,两种ACD测量技术之间的一致性显着提高(均值差0.15±0.16 mm;一致性极限为0.16至0.45 mm)。通过Sirius和超声方法测量的CCT和ACD显示,使用任一仪器在同一受试者中进行的重复测量之间具有很好的一致性(可重复性)。但是,即使通过减去使用任何一种技术获得的CCT值校正超声ACD之后,CCT和ACD值也不应互换使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号