首页> 外文OA文献 >Central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurement by Sirius® Scheimpfug tomography and ultrasound
【2h】

Central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurement by Sirius® Scheimpfug tomography and ultrasound

机译:Sirius®Scheimpfug断层扫描和超声测量中央角膜厚度和前房深度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the new Sirius® Scheimpflug anterior segment examination device for measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) with that of CCT measurements obtained by ultrasound pachymetry and ACD measurements obtained by ultrasound biometry, respectively.Methods: CCT and ACD was measured in 50 right eyes from 50 healthy subjects using a Sirius Scheimpflug camera, SP100 ultrasound pachymetry, and US800 ultrasound biometry.Results: CCT measured with the Sirius was 546 ± 39 μm and 541 ± 35 μm with SP100 ultrasound pachymetry (P = 0.003). The difference was statistically significant (mean difference 4.68 ± 10.5 μm; limits of agreement −15.8 to 25.20 μm). ACD measured with the Sirius was 2.96 ± 0.3 mm compared with 3.36 ± 0.29 mm using US800 ultrasound biometry (P , 0.001). The difference was statistically significant (mean difference -0.40 ± 0.16 mm; limits of agreement -0.72 to 0.07 mm). When the ACD values obtained using ultrasound biometry were corrected according to the values for CCT measured by ultrasound, the agreement increased significantly between both technologies for ACD measurements (mean difference 0.15 ± 0.16 mm; limits of agreement -0.16 to 0.45 mm).Conclusion: CCT and ACD measured by Sirius and ultrasound methods showing good agreement between repeated measurements obtained in the same subjects (repeatability) with either instrument. However, CCT and ACD values, even after correcting ultrasound ACD by subtracting the CCT value obtained with either technology should not be used interchangeably.Keywords: Scheimpflug corneal tomography, ultrasound biometry, ultrasound pachymetry, limits of agreement.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是比较新型Sirius®Scheimpflug前节检查设备用于测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)和前房深度(ACD)与通过超声测厚法和ACD测量获得的CCT测量的准确性方法:使用Sirius Scheimpflug相机,SP100超声测厚仪和US800超声生物测定法对50名健康受试者的50只右眼的CCT和ACD进行测量。 SP100超声波测厚法为541±35μm(P = 0.003)。差异具有统计学意义(平均差异4.68±10.5μm;一致极限-15.8至25.20μm)。 Sirius测得的ACD为2.96±0.3 mm,而US800超声生物测定法测得的ACD为3.36±0.29 mm(P = 0.001)。差异具有统计学意义(平均差异为-0.40±0.16 mm;一致极限为-0.72至0.07 mm)。当根据超声测得的CCT值校正使用超声生物测定法获得的ACD值时,两种ACD测量技术之间的一致性显着提高(平均差异0.15±0.16 mm;一致性极限-0.16至0.45 mm)。通过Sirius和超声方法测量的CCT和ACD显示,使用任一仪器在同一受试者中进行的重复测量之间具有很好的一致性(重复性)。然而,即使通过减去使用任何一种技术获得的CCT值校正超声ACD之后,CCT和ACD值也不能互换使用。关键词:Scheimpflug角膜断层扫描术,超声生物测定法,超声测厚法,一致性限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号