首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, Visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography, Cirrus optical coherence tomography, and Pentacam Scheimpflug camera tomography
【24h】

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, Visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography, Cirrus optical coherence tomography, and Pentacam Scheimpflug camera tomography

机译:使用超声测厚仪,Visante前段光学相干断层扫描,Cirrus光学相干断层扫描和Pentacam Scheimpflug照相机断层扫描对角膜水肿中央角膜厚度测量值的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements in subjects with corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, Visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (OCT), Cirrus OCT, and Pentacam Scheimpflug camera tomography. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included 46 eyes of 33 patients with corneal edema and a CCT exceeding 550 μm evaluated by ultrasound pachymetry, Visante OCT, Cirrus OCT, and Pentacam. Two observers measured each eye twice. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility were determined and agreement among the devices calculated. Results: CCT was measured in 40 eyes of 29 patients. Regardless of the CCT, the measurements obtained using Visante OCT, Cirrus CCT, and ultrasound pachymetry were well correlated. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility were high among the three devices. Pentacam overestimated the results compared with the other devices, and ultrasound pachymetry was unmeasurable in six (13%) eyes with very thick and opaque corneas. In eyes with mild corneal edema (CCT 551–650 μm), measurements from the four devices were comparable. Conclusion: All devices reliably measured the CCT 650 μm. In eyes with edema exceeding 650 μm, CCT measurements from the Visante OCT, Cirrus OCT, and ultrasound pachymetry devices showed good reproducibility and were well correlated, while the Pentacam overestimated the values compared to the other devices. Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry should not be used in eyes with extreme corneal edema and opacity.
机译:目的:使用超声测厚仪,Visante前段光学相干断层扫描(OCT),Cirrus OCT和Pentacam Scheimpflug相机断层摄影术,比较角膜水肿患者的中心角膜厚度(CCT)测量值。方法:这项前瞻性横断面研究包括33例角膜水肿和超过550μm的CCT的46眼,通过超声测厚仪,Visante OCT,Cirrus OCT和Pentacam进行了评估。两名观察员对每只眼睛测量两次。确定了观察者内部和观察者之间的可重复性,并计算了设备之间的一致性。结果:在29例患者的40眼中测量了CCT。无论采用何种CCT,使用Visante OCT,Cirrus CCT和超声测厚仪获得的测量值均具有良好的相关性。观察者之间和观察者内部的可重复性在这三种设备中很高。与其他设备相比,Pentacam高估了结果,并且在六只(13%)眼睛非常厚且不透明的角膜中,超声测厚法无法测量。在患有轻度角膜浮肿(CCT 551–650μm)的眼睛中,四种设备的测量结果具有可比性。结论:所有器件均可靠地测量了CCT <650μm。对于水肿超过650μm的眼睛,Visante OCT,Cirrus OCT和超声测厚仪进行的CCT测量显示出良好的可重复性并具有良好的相关性,而Pentacam与其他设备相比则高估了该值。患有严重角膜浮肿和混浊的眼睛不应使用Pentacam和超声测厚仪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号