首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal >Comparing flow cytometry immunophenotypic and immunohistochemical analyses in diagnosis and prognosis of chronic lymphoproliferative disorders: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center
【24h】

Comparing flow cytometry immunophenotypic and immunohistochemical analyses in diagnosis and prognosis of chronic lymphoproliferative disorders: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center

机译:比较流式细胞仪免疫表型和免疫组化分析在慢性淋巴细胞增生性疾病的诊断和预后中的作用:三级护理中心的经验

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The latest World Health Organization classification incorporates extensive description of immunophenotype of the neoplastic cells while describing chronic lymphoproliferative disorders (CLPDs). The present study was undertaken with an aim to identify and compare the roles of flow cytometry (FCM) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) as modalities of immunophenotyping in the diagnosis of CLPDs. Materials and Methods: Thirty untreated cases of CLPDs were enrolled in the study. Twenty eight cases of B-CLPD were divided into two groups - chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (21 patients) and non-CLL (7 patients). Peripheral blood/bone marrow aspirate samples were analysed by FCM using various panels of monoclonal antibodies. Immunohistochemical analysis of bone marrow biopsies obtained from these patients was also performed. Results: Panel A of monoclonal antibodies comprising CD5, CD23, CD22, surface membrane immunoglobulin (SmIg), FMC7 and Panel B comprising CD5, CD23, CD22, SmIg, FMC7, CD79b were useful (P P > 0.05) The concordance rate between FCM and IHC ranged from 80% to 100% for all comparable immunological markers. In all cases of CLPDs, we propose a screening panel comprising 9 markers including CD19, CD5, CD23, FMC7, CD10, CD20, CD3, kappa and lambda, which are important for specifying the lineage (B or T), to differentiate CLL from non-CLL group and for deciding the secondary panel. Conclusion: Scoring system using CD5, CD23, CD22, FMC7, CD79b, and SmIg is useful in differentiating CLL from non-CLL cases. Concordance rate of FCM and IHC in CLPDs is 93.3%. Using a panel comprising CD19, CD5, CD23, FMC7, CD10, CD20, CD3, kappa and lambda, a diagnosis of CLL, mantle cell, and follicular lymphoma, the three most common CLPDs can be made. Secondary panels for diagnosis of hairy cell leukemia and T-cell CLPD should be utilized.
机译:背景:世界卫生组织的最新分类对肿瘤细胞的免疫表型进行了广泛描述,同时描述了慢性淋巴细胞增生性疾病(CLPD)。进行本研究的目的是鉴定和比较流式细胞仪(FCM)和免疫组织化学(IHC)作为CLPD诊断中的免疫表型方法。材料和方法:30例未经治疗的CLPD病例纳入研究。 B-CLPD的28例患者分为两组-慢性淋巴细胞性白血病(CLL)(21例)和非CLL(7例)。使用各种单克隆抗体,通过FCM分析外周血/骨髓抽吸物样品。还对从这些患者获得的骨髓活检进行了免疫组织化学分析。结果:包含CD5,CD23,CD22,表面膜免疫球蛋白(SmIg),FMC7的单克隆抗体的A组和包含CD5,CD23,CD22,SmIg,FMC7,CD79b的B组是有用的(PP> 0.05)FCM与对于所有可比较的免疫学标记,IHC的范围从80%到100%。在所有CLPD病例中,我们提出了一个筛选小组,其中包括9个标记,包括CD19,CD5,CD23,FMC7,CD10,CD20,CD3,kappa和lambda,这对于指定谱系(B或T)很重要,以区分CLL与非CLL组,并用于确定辅助面板。结论:使用CD5,CD23,CD22,FMC7,CD79b和SmIg的评分系统有助于区分CLL和非CLL病例。 CLPD中FCM和IHC的一致性率为93.3%。使用包含CD19,CD5,CD23,FMC7,CD10,CD20,CD3,kappa和lambda的面板,对CLL,套细胞和滤泡性淋巴瘤进行诊断,可以制成三种最常见的CLPD。应使用诊断毛细胞白血病和T细胞CLPD的二级面板。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号