首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal >Radical treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer with concurrent chemo radiation-cisplatin versus carboplatin: A randomized comparative phase III trial
【24h】

Radical treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer with concurrent chemo radiation-cisplatin versus carboplatin: A randomized comparative phase III trial

机译:同期化疗放化疗-顺铂和卡铂对局部晚期头颈癌的根治性治疗:一项随机比较III期试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: Concurrent chemoradiation with cisplatin is a standard approach for definitive management of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). Carboplatin, though a platinum group of drug, is generally well-tolerated compared to cisplatin. Aim: The aim is whether carboplatin can be a substitute of cisplatin with equivalent response and with less toxicity profile. Settings and Design: Single institutional prospective randomized phase III study. Materials and Methods: Between January 2011 and August 2012, 100 patients LAHNSCC with normal comorbidities were included. The patients in Arm A received injection carboplatin (AUC 6) 3 weeks along with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) dose 66-70 Gy in conventional fractionation and Arm B received injection cisplatin (100 mg/m 2 ) 3 weeks with same EBRT schedule. Detailed clinical examination along with biopsy for residual or recurrent disease, CT scan of head and neck were done to assess the response, toxicities, and disease-free survival (DFS) in follow-up. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS version 17 used for statistical calculation. For categorical variables, Chi-Square and Fisher Exact tests were used. For continuous variables, independent samples t test were used with 95% CI. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used for comparing the DFS. Results: Overall response rate (CR + PR) were 76.9% in Arm A and 63.6% in Arm B (P = 0.06, non-significant). Statistically significant acute skin (P = 0.003), mucosa (P = 0.003), and upper GI (P = Conclusions: It can be concluded that carboplatin is non-inferior in response with statistically significant less toxicities when compared with cisplatin.
机译:背景:顺铂同时放化疗是确定性治疗局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LAHNSCC)的标准方法。卡铂尽管是铂类药物,但与顺铂相比通常耐受性好。目的:目标是卡铂是否可以替代顺铂并具有相同的反应且毒性较小。设置和设计:单机构前瞻性随机III期研究。材料和方法:2011年1月至2012年8月,纳入100例合并症正常的LAHNSCC患者。 A组患者在常规分流中三周接受卡铂(AUC 6)注射,外照射放疗(EBRT)剂量为66-70 Gy,B组患者接受顺铂(100 mg / m 2 )注射EBRT日程安排为3周。进行了详细的临床检查,以及是否有残留或复发性疾病的活检,头部和颈部的CT扫描,以评估随访中的反应,毒性和无病生存期(DFS)。使用的统计分析:SPSS版本17用于统计计算。对于分类变量,使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验。对于连续变量,使用独立样本t检验和95%CI。 Kaplan-Meier生存分析用于比较DFS。结果:A组的总体缓解率(CR + PR)为76.9%,B组为63.6%(P = 0.06,无统计学意义)。统计学上具有统计学意义的急性皮肤(P = 0.003),粘膜(P = 0.003)和上消化道(P =结论):可以得出结论,与顺铂相比,卡铂的毒性无统计学意义,且无统计学意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号