首页> 外文期刊>Chronic respiratory disease. >An economic evaluation of a self-management programme of activity, coping and education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
【24h】

An economic evaluation of a self-management programme of activity, coping and education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

机译:慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者活动,应对和教育自我管理计划的经济评估

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim was to undertake a cost-utility analysis of a self-management programme of activity, coping and education (SPACE) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The analysis was conducted alongside a six-month randomized controlled trial in 30 primary care settings. The economic analysis used data from 184 patients with confirmed diagnosis of COPD, forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity ratio The mean difference in costs between usual care and SPACE FOR COPD programme was ?£27.18 (95% confidence interval (CI); ?£122.59 to £68.25) while mean difference in QALYs was ?0.10 (95% CI; ?0.17 to ?0.02). The results suggest that the intervention is more costly and more effective than usual care. The probability of the intervention being cost-effective was 97% at a threshold of £20,000/QALY gained. We conclude that the SPACE FOR COPD programme is cost-effective compared to usual care.
机译:目的是对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的活动,应对和教育(SPACE)自我管理计划进行成本-效用分析。该分析是在30个初级保健机构中进行的为期6个月的随机对照试验的同时进行的。经济分析使用了184例确诊为COPD的患者的数据,一秒钟的呼气量/强制肺活量比值。常规护理与SPACE FOR COPD计划之间的平均费用差为£27.18(95%置信区间(CI) ; £ 122.59至£ 68.25),而QALYs的平均差为0.10.10(95%CI;?0.17至0.020.02)。结果表明,该干预措施比常规护理更昂贵,更有效。以gained20,000 / QALY为阈值,干预具有成本效益的可能性为97%。我们得出结论,与常规护理相比,SPACE FOR COPD计划具有成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号