首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Chronic Respiratory Disease >An economic evaluation of a self-management programme of activity coping and education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
【2h】

An economic evaluation of a self-management programme of activity coping and education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

机译:慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者活动应对和教育自我管理计划的经济评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim was to undertake a cost-utility analysis of a self-management programme of activity, coping and education (SPACE) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The analysis was conducted alongside a six-month randomized controlled trial in 30 primary care settings. The economic analysis used data from 184 patients with confirmed diagnosis of COPD, forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity ratio <0.7 and with grade 2–5 on the Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale. Participants received either a self-management programme consisting of an education manual (SPACE for COPD) and consultation or usual care. Six-month costs were estimated from the National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated based on patient responses at baseline and six months.The mean difference in costs between usual care and SPACE FOR COPD programme was −£27.18 (95% confidence interval (CI); −£122.59 to £68.25) while mean difference in QALYs was −0.10 (95% CI; −0.17 to −0.02). The results suggest that the intervention is more costly and more effective than usual care. The probability of the intervention being cost-effective was 97% at a threshold of £20,000/QALY gained. We conclude that the SPACE FOR COPD programme is cost-effective compared to usual care.
机译:目的是对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的活动,应对和教育(SPACE)自我管理计划进行成本-效用分析。该分析是在30个初级保健机构中进行的为期六个月的随机对照试验的同时进行的。经济分析使用了184例确诊为COPD的患者的数据,以一秒钟的时间呼气量/肺活量比值<0.7,并且医学研究委员会的呼吸困难等级为2-5。参加者接受了包括教育手册(COPD的SPACE)和咨询或常规护理在内的自我管理计划。从国家卫生服务和个人社会服务的角度估计了六个月的费用,并根据基线和六个月的患者反应计算了质量调整生命年(QALYs)。常规护理和SPACE FOR COPD计划之间的平均费用差异为-£27.18(95%置信区间(CI);-£122.59至£68.25),而QALYs的平均差异为-0.10(95%CI; -0.17至-0.02)。结果表明,该干预措施比常规护理更昂贵,更有效。干预措施具有成本效益的可能性为97%,门槛为20,000英镑/每QALY。我们得出结论,与常规护理相比,SPACE FOR COPD计划具有成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号