首页> 外文期刊>Ciencia e Saude Coletiva >Humanism, freedom and need: an understanding of the cognitive gaps between the natural sciences and ethics
【24h】

Humanism, freedom and need: an understanding of the cognitive gaps between the natural sciences and ethics

机译:人文,自由和需要:对自然科学与伦理学之间认知鸿沟的理解

获取原文
       

摘要

The growing ascertainment, guided by the natural sciences, of the determinism that rules how living organisms work is often contrasted with a humanism of Kantian foundation. At issue here is the actual condition of human autonomy, reverberating on that of human responsibility both at the social and at the individual levels. Based on Spinozist philosophy, Atlan endorses the deterministic postulates of scientific investigations, though he reconciles them to the statement of the human being?’s full freedom and responsibility. Initially, with the strategic background of distinctions in conceptions of human nature, we will review the different approaches of autonomy and determinism on the part of ethics and science. We will then concentrate on the discussion of the dilemma by Atlan, in his essay of 2002, La Science est-elle Inhumaine: essai sur la libre nécessité. Our conclusion redefines the meaning of "humanism" pursuant to the new conceptual demands of the 21st century.
机译:在自然科学的指导下,对决定活生物体工作方式的决定论的日益增长的确定,常常与康德基金会的人本主义形成鲜明对比。这里讨论的是人类自治的实际状况,在社会和个人层面上都对人类责任的状况产生了影响。阿特兰基于Spinozist哲学,赞同科学研究的确定性假设,尽管他使它们与人类的完全自由和责任的陈述相一致。最初,以人性概念差异的战略背景为基础,我们将从伦理学和科学学的角度审视自治和决定论的不同方法。然后,我们将集中讨论Atlan在其困境中的讨论,即他在2002年发表的《科学与发展》杂志上的文章:《自由的生活》。我们的结论根据21世纪的新概念要求重新定义了“人道主义”的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号