首页> 外文期刊>Chinese journal of cancer >Efficacy and safety of controlled-release oxycodonealoxone versus controlled-release oxycodone in Korean patients with cancer-related pain: a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of controlled-release oxycodonealoxone versus controlled-release oxycodone in Korean patients with cancer-related pain: a randomized controlled trial

机译:控释羟考酮/纳洛酮与控释羟考酮在韩国癌症相关性疼痛患者中的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Controlled-release oxycodonealoxone (OXN-CR) maintains the effect of opioid-induced analgesia through oxycodone while reducing the occurrence rate of opioid-induced constipation through naloxone. The present study was designed to assess the non-inferiority of OXN-CR to controlled-release oxycodone (OX-CR) for the control of cancer-related pain in Korean patients. Methods In this randomized, open-labeled, parallel-group, phase IV study, we enrolled patients aged 20?years or older with moderate to severe cancer-related pain [numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score ≥4] from seven Korean oncology/hematology centers. Patients in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population were randomized (1:1) to OXN-CR or OX-CR groups. OXN-CR was administered starting at 20?mg/10?mg per day and up-titrated to a maximum of 80?mg/40?mg per day for 4?weeks, and OX-CR was administered starting at 20?mg/day and up-titrated to a maximum of 80?mg/day for 4?weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in NRS pain score from baseline to week 4, with non-inferiority margin of ?1.5. Secondary endpoints included analgesic rescue medication intake, patient-reported change in bowel habits, laxative intake, quality of life (QoL), and safety assessments. Results Of the ITT population comprising 128 patients, 7 with missing primary efficacy data and 4 who violated the eligibility criteria were excluded from the efficacy analysis. At week 4, the mean change in NRS pain scores was not significantly different between the OXN-CR group ( n =?58) and the OX-CR group ( n =?59) (?1.586 vs. ?1.559, P =?0.948). The lower limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval (?0.776 to 0.830) for the difference exceeded the non-inferiority margin ( P Conclusions OXN-CR was non-inferior to OX-CR in terms of pain reduction after 4?weeks of treatment and had a similar safety profile. Studies in larger populations of Korean patients with cancer-related pain are needed to further investigate the effectiveness of OXN-CR for long-term pain control and constipation alleviation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01313780, registered March 8, 2011
机译:背景控释羟考酮/纳洛酮(OXN-CR)通过羟考酮维持阿片类药物引起的镇痛效果,同时降低了纳洛酮引起的阿片类药物引起便秘的发生率。本研究旨在评估OXN-CR对控释羟考酮(OX-CR)的非劣效性,以控制韩国患者的癌症相关疼痛。方法在这项随机,开放标签,平行分组的IV期研究中,我们从7例韩国肿瘤科招募了20岁或以上患有中度至重度癌症相关疼痛[数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分≥4]的患者/血液学中心。将意向性治疗(ITT)人群中的患者随机(1:1)分为OXN-CR或OX-CR组。每天以20?mg / 10?mg的剂量开始服用OXN-CR,并在4周内逐渐调高至每天最高80?mg / 40?mg,并以20?mg / mg的剂量开始服用OX-CR。每天最多可将其滴定至每天80毫克,持续4星期。主要疗效终点是从基线到第4周NRS疼痛评分的变化,非劣效性差约为1.5。次要终点包括镇痛营救药物的摄入量,患者报告的排便习惯变化,通便性摄入量,生活质量(QoL)和安全性评估。结果在包括128例患者的ITT人群中,7例缺乏主要疗效数据,4例违反资格标准。在第4周,在OXN-CR组(n =?58)和OX-CR组(n =?59)之间,NRS疼痛评分的平均变化没有显着差异(?1.586 vs.?1.559,P=? 0.948)。差异的单侧95%置信区间的下限(?0.776至0.830)超过了非劣效性界限(P结论OXN-CR在4周后疼痛减轻方面不劣于OX-CR治疗方法和安全性相似。需要对更多韩国癌症相关疼痛患者进行研究,以进一步研究OXN-CR在长期控制疼痛和缓解便秘方面的有效性。 2011年3月8日

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号