...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Science International Journal >Comparative Studies of Carbon Monoxide (CO)Exposure in Homes Using Different Cooking Fuels
【24h】

Comparative Studies of Carbon Monoxide (CO)Exposure in Homes Using Different Cooking Fuels

机译:使用不同烹饪燃料的房屋中一氧化碳(CO)暴露的比较研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In-situ atmospheric monitoring of carbon monoxide (CO) was carried out in ten homes where n-butane gas, kerosene stove and firewood were used as cooking fuels respectively. Of the ten houses, four houses surveyed used n-butane gas only as the fuel type, four other houses used kerosene stove only while the last two houses used firewood only. A dosimeter, humidity/ temperature meter were used in determining the concentrations of the CO, the humidity and the temperatures in the selected homes in urban environments. The diurnal trends of carbon monoxide were monitored for about six weeks in these homes. Health Impact Assessment (HIA) was conducted in these homes using the different cooking fuels after baseline levels of carbon monoxide concentration in the homes were assessed during cooking hours and non–cooking hours. A total of 59 respondents drawn from the ten selected homes were interviewed concerning their experiences of symptoms suggestive of exposure to carbon monoxide. A total of 28 (47.5%) respondents reported had symptoms suggestive of exposure to carbon monoxide. CO levels was highest in the houses were firewood was used as the fuel source and lowest in the houses where n-butane gas was used. However, comparing the results obtained with the World Health Organization and Federal Ministry of Environment standards of 9ppm and 10ppm respectively, the CO values were found to be above limits in some of the houses where n-butane gas, kerosene were used and above the set limits in all the houses where firewood were used as cooking fuel. CO Routine monitoring is recommended and the discontinuous use of firewood as cooking fuel should be strongly enforced not only to reduce the CO concentration but also minimize deforestation.
机译:在十个家庭中对一氧化碳(CO)进行了现场大气监测,分别使用正丁烷气,煤油炉和柴火作为烹饪燃料。在十座房屋中,接受调查的四座房屋仅使用正丁烷气作为燃料类型,其他四座房屋仅使用煤油炉,而后两座房屋仅使用木柴。使用剂量计,湿度/温度计​​确定城市环境中选定房屋中的CO浓度,湿度和温度。在这些住所中监测了一氧化碳的昼夜趋势约六周。在评估烹饪时间和非烹饪时间的房屋中一氧化碳浓度的基准水平之后,在这些房屋中使用不同的烹饪燃料进行健康影响评估(HIA)。来自十个选定房屋的总共59名受访者接受了关于暴露于一氧化碳的症状体验的采访。共有28位(47.5%)的受访者表示有暴露于一氧化碳的症状。在以柴火为燃料的房屋中,CO含量最高,而在使用正丁烷气的房屋中,CO含量最低。但是,与分别以9ppm和10ppm的世界卫生组织和联邦环境部标准获得的结果进行比较,发现在使用正丁烷气,煤油的一些房屋中,CO值超出了限值,并且超过了设定值。所有使用柴火做饭的房屋的限制。建议使用CO进行常规监测,并强烈建议不连续使用木柴作为烹饪燃料,这不仅可以降低CO浓度,还可以最大程度地减少森林砍伐。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号