...
首页> 外文期刊>Cellular Oncology: Analytical Cellular Pathology >Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements
【24h】

Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements

机译:自动形态筛选:不同方法之间的比较,在DNA倍性测量中的应用

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of the present study is to propose alternative automatic methods to time consuming interactive sorting of elements for DNA ploidy measurements. One archival brain tumour and two archival breast carcinoma were studied, corresponding to 7120 elements (3764 nuclei, 3356 debris and aggregates). Three automatic classification methods were tested to eliminate debris and aggregates from DNA ploidy measurements (mathematical morphology (MM), multiparametric analysis (MA) and neural network (NN)). Performances were evaluated by reference to interactive sorting. The results obtained for the three methods concerning the percentage of debris and aggregates automatically removed reach 63, 75 and 85% for MM, MA and NN methods, respectively, with false positive rates of 6, 21 and 25%. Information about DNA ploidy abnormalities were globally preserved after automatic elimination of debris and aggregates by MM and MA methods as opposed to NN method, showing that automatic classification methods can offer alternatives to tedious interactive elimination of debris and aggregates, for DNA ploidy measurements of archival tumours.
机译:本研究的目的是提出用于DNA倍性测量的费时的交互式元素分选的替代自动方法。研究了一种档案性脑肿瘤和两种档案性乳腺癌,对应于7120个元素(3764个核,3356个碎片和聚集体)。测试了三种自动分类方法,以消除DNA倍性测量(数学形态学(MM),多参数分析(MA)和神经网络(NN))中的碎片和聚集体。通过参考交互式排序来评估表演。对于MM,MA和NN方法,三种方法所涉及的自动清除碎片和聚集体百分比的结果分别达到63、75和85%,假阳性率分别为6%,21%和25%。与NN方法相反,通过MM和MA方法自动消除碎片和聚集体后,与DNA倍体异常有关的信息被全局保存,这表明自动分类方法可以为乏味的交互式消除碎片和聚集体提供替代方法,用于存档肿瘤的DNA倍体测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号