首页> 外文期刊>Cellular Oncology: Analytical Cellular Pathology >Comparison between Real-Time Quantitative PCR Detection of HER2 mRNA Copy Number in Peripheral Blood and ELISA of Serum HER2 Protein for Determining HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Patients
【24h】

Comparison between Real-Time Quantitative PCR Detection of HER2 mRNA Copy Number in Peripheral Blood and ELISA of Serum HER2 Protein for Determining HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Patients

机译:实时定量PCR检测外周血HER2 mRNA拷贝数与ELISA检测血清HER2蛋白测定乳腺癌患者HER2状态的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The development of non-invasive procedure to determine HER2 status may represent a powerful method for monitoring disease progression and response to the treatment.Methods: Serum samples and RNA from peripheral blood were evaluated in 85 breast cancer patients (49 HER2 positive and 36 HER2 negative) and 22 healthy controls. HER2 mRNA levels were measured by real-time quantitative PCR (QPCR) and serum HER2 protein by immunoenzimatic assay (EIA). ROC curve analyses were used to determine the optimal cut off values.Results: A statistically significant difference was detected for both QPCR and EIA in HER2 positive patients as compared with both healthy controls and HER2 negative tumours. QPCR showed a 91% (CI95%: 84%–98%) specificity and a 78% (CI95%: 68%–88%) sensitivity for an optimal cut off value of 4.74. The optimal cut off value for EIA was 22 ng/ml yielding a 95% (CI95%: 90%–100%) specificity and a 59% (CI95%: 48%–70%) sensitivity. The QPCR assay was slightly less specific than EIA in discriminating HER2 positive breast cancers from HER2 negative tumours (78% CI95%: 69%–87% versus 86% CI95%: 79%–93%), but it was more sensitive (76% CI95%: 67%–85% versus 55% CI95%: 44%–66%).Conclusions: Our results indicate that QPCR performs better than EIA in the determination of HER2 status of breast cancer patients and could be useful in monitoring the disease during follow up.
机译:背景:确定HER2状态的非侵入性程序的开发可能是监测疾病进展和对治疗的反应的有力方法。方法:对85名乳腺癌患者(49例HER2阳性和36例乳腺癌)的外周血血清和RNA进行了评估HER2阴性)和22个健康对照。 HER2 mRNA水平通过实时定量PCR(QPCR)进行测定,血清HER2蛋白通过免疫酶联测定(EIA)进行测定。结果:与健康对照组和HER2阴性肿瘤相比,HER2阳性患者的QPCR和EIA差异均有统计学意义。 QPCR显示出91%(CI95%:84%–98%)的特异性和78%(CI95%:68%–88%)的灵敏度,最佳临界值为4.74。 EIA的最佳截止值为22 ng / ml,产生95%(CI95%:90%–100%)的特异性和59%(CI95%:48%–70%)的灵敏度。在区分HER2阳性乳腺癌和HER2阴性肿瘤方面,QPCR检测的特异性比EIA稍差(78%CI95%:69%–87%,而86%CI95%:79%–93%),但它更敏感(76 CI95%:67%–85%与55%CI95%:44%–66%)。结论:我们的结果表明,QPCR在确定乳腺癌患者的HER2状态方面比EIA更好,可用于监测乳腺癌患者的HER2状况。随访期间发现疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号