首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Medicine >Comparison of outcome and toxicity of postoperative intensity‐modulated radiation therapy with two‐dimensional radiotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma of extremities and trunk
【24h】

Comparison of outcome and toxicity of postoperative intensity‐modulated radiation therapy with two‐dimensional radiotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma of extremities and trunk

机译:肢体和躯干软组织肉瘤患者术后强度调制放射治疗与二维放射治疗的结果和毒性的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background To compare the survival outcomes and late toxicities of postoperative intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with two‐dimensional radiotherapy (2D‐RT) for patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of extremities and trunk. Methods 274 consecutive patients with nonmetastatic STS of extremities and trunk treated with postoperative IMRT (n?=?187) and 2D‐RT (n?=?87) were analyzed. Survival was calculated by using Kaplan‐Meier method. Independent prognostic factors were identified using Cox stepwise regression analysis for variables with a P ‐value 0.1 in univariate analysis. Results With a median follow‐up time of 58.1?months, 30 local recurrences, 66 distant metastases, and 40 deaths occurred. Compared to 2D‐RT group, the IMRT group had higher 5‐year local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS) (91.1% vs 80.8%; P ?=?0.029), distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS) (80.0% vs 69.7%; P ?=?0.048), disease‐free survival (DFS) (75.2% vs 59.2%; P ?=?0.021), and overall survival (OS) (90.2% vs 81.0%; P ?=?0.029). Multivariate analysis showed IMRT was an independent favorable factor for LRFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS. For late toxicities, the patients in IMRT group enjoyed lower incidences of ≥Grade 2 joint stiffness (3.9% vs 12.3%; P ?=?0.041) and ≥Grade 3 fractures (0.0% vs 3.4%; P ?=?0.25) than those in 2D‐RT group. ≥Grade 2 Edema was similar between these two groups (4.8% vs 9.2%; P ?=?0.183). Conclusions When compared with conventional techniques, postoperative IMRT seems to provide better LRFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS and less late toxicities in patients with STS of extremities and trunk, which should be offered as a preferred treatment.
机译:背景为了比较肢体和躯干软组织肉瘤(STS)患者术后强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)与二维放射治疗(2D-RT)的生存结局和晚期毒性。方法对274例经IMRT(n?=?187)和2D-RT(n?=?87)治疗的四肢和躯干非转移性STS患者进行分析。使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算生存率。使用Cox逐步回归分析对单因素分析中P值<0.1的变量确定独立的预后因素。结果中位随访时间为58.1个月,局部复发30例,远处转移66例,死亡40例。与2D-RT组相比,IMRT组的5年局部无复发生存率(LRFS)更高(91.1%vs 80.8%; P?=?0.029),远处无转移生存率(DMFS)(80.0%vs 69.7) %;P≤0.048),无病生存率(DFS)(75.2%对59.2%; P≤0.021)和总生存率(OS)(90.2%对81.0%; P≤0.029)。多变量分析显示,IMRT是LRFS,DMFS,DFS和OS的独立有利因素。对于晚期毒性,IMRT组患者≥2级关节僵直的发生率(3.9%比12.3%; P == 0.041)和≥3级骨折的发生率(0.0%vs 3.4%; P == 0.25)的发生率更低。 2D-RT组中的人。 ≥两组的2级水肿相似(4.8%比9.2%; P = 0.183)。结论与常规技术相比,IMRT术后对四肢和躯干STS患者提供更好的LRFS,DMFS,DFS和OS,且后期毒性较低,应作为首选治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号