...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Management and Research >Optimized multiparametric flow cytometric analysis of circulating endothelial cells and their subpopulations in peripheral blood of patients with solid tumors: a technical analysis
【24h】

Optimized multiparametric flow cytometric analysis of circulating endothelial cells and their subpopulations in peripheral blood of patients with solid tumors: a technical analysis

机译:实体瘤患者外周血中循环内皮细胞及其亚群的优化多参数流式细胞术分析:技术分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and their subpopulations could be potential novel biomarkers for various malignancies. However, reliable enumerable methods are warranted to further improve their clinical utility. This study aimed to optimize a flow cytometric method (FCM) assay for CECs and subpopulations in peripheral blood for patients with solid cancers. Patients and methods: An FCM assay was used to detect and identify CECs. A panel of 60 blood samples, including 44 metastatic cancer patients and 16 healthy controls, were used in this study. Some key issues of CEC enumeration, including sample material and anticoagulant selection, optimal titration of antibodies, lysis/wash procedures of blood sample preparation, conditions of sample storage, sufficient cell events to enhance the signal, fluorescence-minus-one controls instead of isotype controls to reduce background noise, optimal selection of cell surface markers, and evaluating the reproducibility of our method, were integrated and investigated. Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to determine statistically significant differences. Results: In this validation study, we refined a five-color FCM method to detect CECs and their subpopulations in peripheral blood of patients with solid tumors. Several key technical issues regarding preanalytical elements, FCM data acquisition, and analysis were addressed. Furthermore, we clinically validated the utility of our method. The baseline levels of mature CECs, endothelial progenitor cells, and activated CECs were higher in cancer patients than healthy subjects ( P <0.01). However, there was no significant difference in resting CEC levels between healthy subjects and cancer patients ( P =0.193). Conclusion: We integrated and comprehensively addressed significant technical issues found in previously published assays and validated the reproducibility and sensitivity of our proposed method. Future work is required to explore the potential of our optimized method in clinical oncologic applications.
机译:背景:循环内皮细胞(CEC)及其亚群可能是各种恶性肿瘤的潜在新生物标记。但是,必须使用可靠的可枚举方法来进一步改善其临床实用性。这项研究旨在针对实体癌患者的外周血CEC和亚群优化流式细胞术(FCM)分析。患者和方法:FCM分析用于检测和鉴定CEC。在这项研究中使用了包括60个血液样本的面板,包括44个转移性癌症患者和16个健康对照。 CEC枚举的一些关键问题,包括样品材料和抗凝剂选择,抗体的最佳滴定,血液样品制备的裂解/清洗程序,样品存储条件,足够的细胞事件以增强信号,荧光减一控制而不是同种型整合并研究了减少背景噪音,优化选择细胞表面标记以及评估我们方法的重现性的控件。 Wilcoxon和Mann-Whitney U检验用于确定统计学上的显着差异。结果:在这项验证研究中,我们改进了五色FCM方法,以检测实体瘤患者外周血中的CEC及其亚群。解决了有关分析前元素,FCM数据采集和分析的几个关键技术问题。此外,我们在临床上验证了我们方法的实用性。癌症患者中成熟CEC,内皮祖细胞和活化CEC的基线水平高于健康受试者(P <0.01)。然而,健康受试者和癌症患者之间的静息CEC水平没有显着差异(P = 0.193)。结论:我们整合并全面解决了先前发表的测定法中发现的重大技术问题,并验证了我们提出的方法的重现性和敏感性。需要进一步的工作来探索我们优化方法在临床肿瘤学应用中的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号