...
首页> 外文期刊>Business Research >Determinants of Advertising Effectiveness: The Development of an International Advertising Elasticity Database and a Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Determinants of Advertising Effectiveness: The Development of an International Advertising Elasticity Database and a Meta-Analysis

机译:广告效果的决定因素:国际广告弹性数据库的开发和元分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Increasing demand for marketing accountability requires an efficient allocation of marketing expenditures. Managers who know the elasticity of their marketing instruments can allocate their budgets optimally. Meta-analyses offer a basis for deriving benchmark elasticities for advertising. Although they provide a variety of valuable insights, a major shortcoming of prior meta-analyses is that they report only generalized results as the disaggregated raw data are not made available. This problem is highly relevant because coding of empirical studies, at least to a certain extent, involves subjective judgment. For this reason, meta-studies would be more valuable if researchers and practitioners had access to disaggregated data allowing them to conduct further analyses of individual, e.g., product-level-specific, interests. We are the first to address this gap by providing (1) an advertising elasticity database (AED) and (2) empirical generalizations about advertising elasticities and their determinants. Our findings indicate that the average current-period advertising elasticity is 0.09, which is substantially smaller than the value 0f 0.12 that was recently reported by Sethuraman, Tellis, and Briesch (2011) . Furthermore, our meta-analysis reveals a wide range of significant determinants of advertising elasticity. For example, we find that advertising elasticities are higher (i) for hedonic and experience goods than for other goods; (ii) for new than for established goods; (iii) when advertising is measured in gross rating points (GRP) instead of absolute terms; and (iv) when the lagged dependent or lagged advertising variable is omitted.
机译:对营销责任制的需求不断增加,需要有效分配营销支出。知道其营销工具的弹性的经理可以最佳地分配预算。荟萃分析为得出广告基准弹性提供了基础。尽管它们提供了各种有价值的见解,但以前的荟萃分析的主要缺点是,由于未提供分类的原始数据,因此它们仅报告广义结果。这个问题是高度相关的,因为至少在一定程度上,经验研究的编码涉及主观判断。因此,如果研究人员和从业人员可以访问分类数据,使他们能够对个人(例如特定于产品级别的利益)进行进一步分析,那么元研究将更有价值。我们是第一个通过提供(1)广告弹性数据库(AED)和(2)关于广告弹性及其决定因素的经验总结来解决这一差距的公司。我们的发现表明,当前时段的平均广告弹性为0.09,远小于Sethuraman,Tellis和Briesch(2011)最近报告的0f 0.12值。此外,我们的荟萃分析揭示了广告弹性的许多重要决定因素。例如,我们发现享乐和体验商品的广告弹性更高(i)比其他商品更高; (ii)较之于既有货而言新的; (iii)广告以总评分点(GRP)而非绝对条款衡量; (iv)省略了滞后因变量或滞后广告变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号