首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Forum >Risk profiling and surveillance: previous adenomas and colorectal cancer
【24h】

Risk profiling and surveillance: previous adenomas and colorectal cancer

机译:风险分析和监测:既往腺瘤和结直肠癌

获取原文
       

摘要

The brief of this issue of Cancer Forum is to review information available since the 2005 publication of the National Health and Medical Research Council relating to risk management of individuals with previous adenomas or colorectal cancer. However, this can be abbreviated to the last three years, as Cancer Council Australia commissioned a review of colonoscopy in surveillance for colorectal cancer, which included adenoma and cancer follow-up. This has subsequently been endorsed by the National Health and Medical Research Council. Since then, there have been advances in some areas, although many questions remain and clinical judgement comes into play. In the current era of accountability, economic hardship and increasing demand, surveillance strategies should be proven effective and individualised, based on issues such as fitness, quality of life and personal preferences. International guidelines have aligned, although the simpler strategies specified in European guidelines are noted with interest. Despite clear recommendations, the lack of guideline use in routine practice is concerning and widespread promulgation of simple ‘aid-memoirs’ could help, along with incentives. Information supports risk related to multiplicity, size and histopathology of adenoma and cancer findings at the index colonoscopy. Quality issues relating to colonoscopy and pathology reporting are being driven through professional fora and training. The paradox of multiplicity and quality colonoscopy needs addressing in a patient-centred response. Risk-stratification and adjustment over time is likely to gain increasing importance. The serrated pathway, its biology and epidemiology, have attracted attention for the rapid progression and association with interval cancers. Practice points for the management of malignant polyps continue to be topical. The effectiveness of intensive follow up strategies following curative treatment for colorectal cancer remains unproven, although colonoscopic surveillance is still of value.
机译:本期癌症论坛的简述是回顾自2005年美国国家卫生与医学研究委员会(National Health and Medical Research Council)出版以来可获得的有关先前患有腺瘤或结直肠癌的个体的风险管理的信息。但是,这可以缩写为最近三年,因为澳大利亚癌症委员会委托对结肠镜检查进行审查,以监测结直肠癌,其中包括腺瘤和癌症随访。随后,这得到了国家卫生和医学研究理事会的认可。从那以后,尽管仍然存在许多问题并且临床判断开始起作用,但是在某些领域已经取得了进步。在当前的问责制,经济困难和需求增长的时代,应基于诸如适应性,生活质量和个人喜好等问题,证明监督策略是有效且个性化的。尽管有兴趣地注意到欧洲准则中指定的较简单的策略,但国际准则已保持一致。尽管提出了明确的建议,但令人担忧的是常规实践中缺乏指导原则,广泛颁布简单的“备忘录”可能会有所帮助,同时还会提供激励措施。信息支持与腺瘤的多样性,大小和组织病理学相关的风险以及在结肠镜检查时发现的癌症。有关结肠镜检查和病理报告的质量问题正在通过专业论坛和培训来推动。多样性和高质量结肠镜检查的悖论需要解决以患者为中心的反应。随着时间的推移,风险分层和调整可能会变得越来越重要。锯齿状途径,其生物学和流行病学已引起人们的注意,因为它们的进展迅速并与间隔癌相关。处理恶性息肉的实践要点仍然是热门话题。尽管结肠镜检查仍然很有价值,但大肠癌根治性治疗后强化随访策略的有效性尚未得到证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号