...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology >The use of antipyschotic prescription for an university psychiatry clinic: A retrospective study
【24h】

The use of antipyschotic prescription for an university psychiatry clinic: A retrospective study

机译:某大学精神病学诊所使用抗精神病药处方的回顾性研究

获取原文

摘要

Objective: The launch of new generation antipsychotics in 1990 impacting the prescription trends all over the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate trends and patterns regarding antipsychotic prescription on inpatient and outpatient basis at a university clinic. Method: Study period encompassed the years 1996-2005. A total of 34120 records were reached and retrospectively evaluated. Those who had been prescribed antipsychotic medicine of any kind were chosen for the study group (n=2868). Patients’ socio-demogra?c characteristics, diagnosis, the ?rst choice antipsychotic, and were included determined the switch of ?rst antipsychotic and the reasons for that switch. Results: Prescription of conventional antipsychotics has been decreased dramatically within the study period (89.8%-15.5%) where the new generation antipsyhotics were introduced. The most commonly used new generation antipsychotics were risperidone (38.7%), olanzapine (22.4%) and clozapine (19.8%). While new generation antipsychotics stand for chronic psychosis like schizophrenia (58.2%), conventional ones stand for affective psychosis (56.8%). Antipsychoticswitch was not made for 70.3% of clasical antipsychotics and 85.9% of new generation antipsychotics during the study period. The most common reason for antipsychotic switch was lack of ef?cacy for both clasical and new generation antipsychotics (35.3%). Conclusion: Study period indicates a major shift in prescription patterns. Dominating preference of new generation antipsychotics seem to be the case for that shift in question. Rate of antipsychotic switch was low for both groups, but more switch was made for classical antipsychotics.
机译:目的:1990年推出新一代抗精神病药,影响了全世界的处方趋势。这项研究的目的是评估在大学诊所的住院和门诊患者抗精神病药物处方的趋势和模式。方法:研究期为1996- 2005年。共有34120条记录,并进行了回顾性评估。研究组选择了接受过各种抗精神病药物治疗的患者(n = 2868)。患者的社会民主特征,诊断,抗精神病药物的第一选择,并包括确定第一抗精神病药物的转换及其发生原因的原因。结果:在引入新一代抗精神病药的研究期内,常规抗精神病药的处方已大大减少(89.8%-15.5%)。最常用的新一代抗精神病药是利培酮(38.7%),奥氮平(22.4%)和氯氮平(19.8%)。新一代抗精神病药代表精神分裂症等慢性精神病(58.2%),而传统抗精神病药代表情感性精神病(56.8%)。在研究期间,未对70.3%的经典抗精神病药和85.9%的新一代抗精神病药进行抗精神病药转换。抗精神病药转换的最常见原因是经典抗精神病药和新一代抗精神病药均缺乏疗效(35.3%)。结论:研究期表明处方模式发生了重大变化。新一代抗精神病药的主导偏好似乎是这种转移的情况。两组的抗精神病药转换率均较低,但经典抗精神病药的转换率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号