首页> 外文期刊>Cadernos de Saúde Pública >The demand-control model for job strain: a commentary on different ways to operationalize the exposure variable
【24h】

The demand-control model for job strain: a commentary on different ways to operationalize the exposure variable

机译:工作压力的需求控制模型:关于操作暴露变量的不同方法的评论

获取原文
       

摘要

Demand-control has been the most widely used model to study job strain in various countries. However, researchers have used the model differently, thus hindering the comparison of results. Such heterogeneity appears in both the study instrument used and in the definition of the main exposure variable - high strain. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess differences between various ways of operationalizing job strain through association with prevalent hypertension in a cohort of workers (Pro-Health Study). No difference in the association between high job strain and hypertension was found according to the different ways of operationalizing exposure, even though prevalence varied widely, according to the adopted form, from 19.6% for quadrants to 42% for subtraction tertile. The authors recommend further studies to define the cutoff for exposure variables using combined subjective and objective data.
机译:需求控制已成为研究各国工作压力的最广泛使用的模型。但是,研究人员使用该模型的方式有所不同,因此妨碍了结果的比较。这种异质性出现在所使用的研究仪器和主要暴露变量-高应变的定义中。这项横断面研究旨在评估通过与一群工人中普遍存在的高血压相关的各种工作压力操作方法之间的差异(赞成健康研究)。根据采用的不同暴露方式,即使高患病率与高血压的相关性也没有发现差异,尽管根据采用的形式,患病率差异很大,从象限的19.6%到减法三分位数的42%。作者建议进行进一步研究,以使用主观和客观数据相结合来定义暴露变量的临界值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号