...
首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy >Effects of diaphragmatic control on the assessment of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure and maximum relaxation rate
【24h】

Effects of diaphragmatic control on the assessment of sniff nasal inspiratory pressure and maximum relaxation rate

机译:横diaphragm膜控制对评估鼻吸气量和最大舒张率的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective:To assess the influence of diaphragmatic activation control (diaphC) on Sniff Nasal-Inspiratory Pressure (SNIP) and Maximum Relaxation Rate of inspiratory muscles (MRR) in healthy subjects.Method:Twenty subjects (9 male; age: 23 (SD=2.9) years; BMI: 23.8 (SD=3) kg/m2; FEV1/FVC: 0.9 (SD=0.1)] performed 5 sniff maneuvers in two different moments: with or without instruction on diaphC. Before the first maneuver, a brief explanation was given to the subjects on how to perform the sniff test. For sniff test with diaphC, subjects were instructed to perform intense diaphragm activation. The best SNIP and MRR values were used for analysis. MRR was calculated as the ratio of first derivative of pressure over time (dP/dtmax) and were normalized by dividing it by peak pressure (SNIP) from the same maneuver.Results:SNIP values were significantly different in maneuvers with and without diaphC [without diaphC: -100 (SD=27.1) cmH2O/ with diaphC: -72.8 (SD=22.3) cmH2O; p0.0001], normalized MRR values were not statistically different [without diaphC: -9.7 (SD=2.6); with diaphC: -8.9 (SD=1.5); p=0.19]. Without diaphC, 40% of the sample did not reach the appropriate sniff criteria found in the literature.Conclusion:Diaphragmatic control performed during SNIP test influences obtained inspiratory pressure, being lower when diaphC is performed. However, there was no influence on normalized MRR.
机译:目的:评估横diaphragm膜激活控制(diaphC)对健康受试者嗅鼻吸气压力(SNIP)和最大吸气肌松弛率(MRR)的影响。方法:二十名受试者(9名男性;年龄:23​​(SD = 2.9)年; BMI:23.8(SD = 3)kg / m2; FEV1 / FVC:0.9(SD = 0.1)]在两个不同的时刻执行了5次嗅探操作:有或没有关于diaphC的指令。对受试者进行了嗅觉测试的说明;对于使用diaphC进行的嗅觉测试,将指示受试者进行强烈的diaphragm肌激活;使用最佳SNIP和MRR值进行分析;计算MRR作为结果:在有或没有膜隔膜的情况下,SNIP值在有和没有膜隔膜的情况下均存在显着差异[无膜隔膜:-100(SD = 27.1)cmH2O /具有diaphC:-72.8(SD = 22.3)cmH2O; p <0.0001],标准化MRR值无统计学差异[无diaphC:-9.7(SD = 2.6); diaphC:-8.9(SD = 1.5); p = 0.19]。没有diaphC,则40%的样品未达到文献中发现的适当嗅探标准。结论:SNIP测试过程中进行的隔膜控制会影响获得的吸气压力,而进行diaphC时则较低。但是,对归一化的MRR没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号