首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >Health care utilization and cost after discharge from a mental health hospital; an RCT comparing community residential aftercare and treatment as usual
【24h】

Health care utilization and cost after discharge from a mental health hospital; an RCT comparing community residential aftercare and treatment as usual

机译:从精神病院出院后的卫生保健利用率和费用;一项RCT,与往常一样比较了社区住宅的后期护理和治疗

获取原文
           

摘要

Community residential aftercare (step-down) services can ease the transition after a mental health hospital stay for patients with severe mental illness (SMI). To investigate use of community and specialised mental health care services and costs in patients with SMI the first 12?months after discharge from a mental health hospital (MHH), comparing community residential aftercare (CRA) and treatment as usual. An open parallel group randomised controlled trial with 41 participants. Data on use of specialist services (hospital, ambulant treatment and outpatient treatment) and community services (residential stays, home help, home care nursing, mental health consultation) were collected from specialist and community registers and health records. For the primary outcome, utilisation of community mental health services, the intervention group used, on average, 29% fewer hours (mean differences ??21.6?h, 95% CI -93.1 to 44.9, p?=?.096) with a cost saving of 29% (mean differences ??1845 EUR, 95% CI -8267 to 4171, p?=?.102), but the estimates were imprecise. For the secondary outcome, the study groups had the same total number of inpatient days (66?days), but the intervention group had on average of 13.4 fewer inpatient days in the mental health hospital (95% CI -29.9 to 0.9. p?=?.008). The number of inpatient admissions (mean difference???0.9 admissions, 95% CI -3.5 to 1.5, p?=?.224) and readmissions (??0.8, 95% CI -2.5 to 0.9. p?=?.440) was lower in the intervention group. The intervention group had on average a total cost saving of 38.5% (mean differences ??23,071 EUR, 95% CI -45,450 to 3027. p?=?.057). A post hoc multivariable regression analysis controlling for baseline characteristics gave a reduction in total cost in favour of the intervention group of ??19,781 EUR (95% CI -44,072 to 4509, p=,107). In this study, it was not possible to draw a definite conclusion about the effect, due to the small sample and imprecision of the estimates. The direction of the results and size of the point estimate, in addition to findings in other studies, indicates that transferring patients ready for discharge from mental hospital to community residential aftercare can have the potential to reduce total consumption of health services and costs without increased hospital admissions.
机译:对于重度精神疾病(SMI)的患者,在精神病院住院后,社区住宅的后期护理(逐步降低)服务可以简化过渡过程。为了调查在精神病医院(MHH)出院后的最初12个月中SMI患者使用社区和专门的精神保健服务的费用,并比较社区寄宿后护理(CRA)和常规治疗的情况。一个开放平行小组的随机对照试验,有41名参与者。从专科医生和社区登记簿以及健康记录中收集了有关专科服务使用情况(医院,急救治疗和门诊治疗)和社区服务(居留,家政服务,家庭护理,心理健康咨询)的数据。对于主要结果,即利用社区精神卫生服务,干预组平均减少了29%的时间(平均差异?? 21.6?h,95%CI -93.1至44.9,p?= ?. 096)。节省了29%的成本(平均差额为1845欧元,95%CI -8267到4171,p?= ?. 102),但估算结果不准确。对于次要结局,研究组的住院天数总数相同(66天),但干预组在精神卫生医院的住院天数平均减少了13.4天(95%CI -29.9至0.9。 = ?. 008)。住院病人的入院次数(平均入院人数为0.9,95%CI -3.5至1.5,p?= ?. 224)和再入院次数(?0.8,95%CI -2.5至0.9。p?= ?. 440)。 )在干预组中较低。干预组平均总共节省了38.5%(平均差额为23,071欧元,95%CI为-45,450到3027。p?= ?. 057)。控制基线特征的事后多变量回归分析显示,干预组的总费用减少了19,781欧元(95%CI -44,072至4509,p = 107)。在这项研究中,由于样本量少且估计值不准确,因此无法就此效应得出确切的结论。结果的方向和估计点的大小,以及其他研究的结果表明,将准备从精神病院出院的患者转移到社区寄宿后护理可能会减少医疗服务和费用的总消耗,而无需增加医院招生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号