...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Racial and ethnic differences in primary, unscheduled cesarean deliveries among low-risk primiparous women at an academic medical center: a retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Racial and ethnic differences in primary, unscheduled cesarean deliveries among low-risk primiparous women at an academic medical center: a retrospective cohort study

机译:学术医疗中心低风险初产妇女在原发性,计划外剖宫产中的种族和种族差异:回顾性队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Cesarean sections are the most common surgical procedure for women in the United States. Of the over 4 million births a year, one in three are now delivered in this manner and the risk adjusted prevalence rates appear to vary by race and ethnicity. However, data from individual studies provides limited or contradictory information on race and ethnicity as an independent predictor of delivery mode, precluding accurate generalizations. This study sought to assess the extent to which primary, unscheduled cesarean deliveries and their indications vary by race/ethnicity in one academic medical center. Methods A retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study was conducted of 4,483 nulliparous women with term, singleton, and vertex presentation deliveries at a major academic medical center between 2006–2011. Cases with medical conditions, risk factors, or pregnancy complications that can contribute to increased cesarean risk or contraindicate vaginal birth were excluded. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate differences in delivery mode and caesarean indications among racial and ethnic groups. Results The overall rate of cesarean delivery in our cohort was 16.7%. Compared to White women, Black and Asian women had higher rates of cesarean delivery than spontaneous vaginal delivery, (adjusted odds ratio {AOR}: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.91, and AOR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.02, 2.17, respectively). Black women were also more likely, compared to White women, to undergo cesarean for fetal distress and indications diagnosed in the first stage as compared to the second stage of labor. Conclusions Racial and ethnic differences in delivery mode and indications for cesareans exist among low-risk nulliparas at our institution. These differences may be best explained by examining the variation in clinical decisions that indicate fetal distress and failure to progress at the hospital-level.
机译:背景剖宫产术是美国女性最常用的手术方法。在每年超过400万的分娩中,现在有三分之一的分娩是通过这种方式进行的,风险调整后的患病率似乎因种族和种族而异。然而,来自个别研究的数据提供了关于种族和种族的有限或自相矛盾的信息,将其作为分娩方式的独立预测因素,这排除了准确的概括。这项研究试图评估一个学术医学中心原发性,计划外剖宫产的分娩程度及其适应症因种族/民族而异。方法回顾性,横断性队列研究在2006年至2011年之间,对一家主要学术医学中心的4,483例未分娩妇女进行了足月,单身和顶点表现分娩。排除可能导致剖宫产风险增加或禁忌阴道分娩的医疗状况,危险因素或妊娠并发症的病例。多项逻辑回归分析用于评估种族和族裔在分娩方式和剖腹产指征方面的差异。结果我们队列中的剖宫产总率为16.7%。与白人女性相比,黑人和亚裔女性的剖腹产率要高于自然阴道分娩(调整后的优势比{AOR}:1.43; 95%CI:1.07、1.91和AOR:1.49; 95%CI:1.02、2.17 , 分别)。与白人妇女相比,黑人妇女也更可能因剖宫产而遭受剖宫产,与第一阶段的第二阶段相比,在第一阶段被诊断出患病迹象。结论我们机构中低风险的原产妇在分娩方式和剖宫产适应症方面存在种族和种族差异。这些差异可以通过检查临床决策的变化来最好地解释,这些变化表明在医院一级存在胎儿窘迫和无法进展的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号