首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Women’s experiences of being invited to participate in a case-control study of stillbirth - findings from the Midlands and North of England Stillbirth Study
【24h】

Women’s experiences of being invited to participate in a case-control study of stillbirth - findings from the Midlands and North of England Stillbirth Study

机译:妇女受邀参加死胎病例对照研究的经历-来自中部和英格兰北部死胎研究的发现

获取原文

摘要

The Midlands and North of England Stillbirth Study (MiNESS) was a case-control study of women who had a stillbirth or who had an ongoing pregnancy. During the set up phase questions were raised about whether interviewing women within six weeks of a stillbirth and recruiting women who were still pregnant into a “stillbirth” study was acceptable. This led to the research questions “whether it is appropriate to ask women who have recently experienced a stillbirth to participate in research?” and “whether it is appropriate to ask pregnant women to participate in a research project looking at factors associated with stillbirth.” This nested study aimed to describe the opinions of women approached to participate in MiNESS to explore their views and experiences of a research project focussed on stillbirth. Semi- structured interviews were conducted at a single study site involved in MiNESS. Purposive sampling was used to obtain a sample of women who were approached following a stillbirth (case n?=?6) and those who were approached during pregnancy who gave birth to a live born baby (control n?=?6). These two groups of women were divided equally according to whether they participated in the main MiNESS questionnaire study and those who declined to do so (n?=?3 in each group). Interview data were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis to identify the most important factors in determining whether women participated in MiNESS. The following themes emerged from the analysis: participants’ understanding of research; approach by researcher; wanting to help; stillbirth taboo. These themes are explored individually in the manuscript. Participants reported positive views about research and previous participation in research studies. Respondents valued an initial approach from a member of staff already known to them. The taboo around stillbirth was a barrier to participation for some women with ongoing pregnancies. Experiences and views regarding research differed between participants and non-participants in the MiNESS study. Participants reported a greater understanding of the importance and implications of clinical research. When designing future studies, the timing of approach, clarity of information and the person approaching potential participants should be considered to optimise recruitment. NCT02025530 date registered: 01/01/2014.
机译:英格兰中部和北部的死产研究(MiNESS)是一项对有死产或持续妊娠的妇女进行的病例对照研究。在准备阶段,提出了以下问题:是否可以接受在死产后六周内采访妇女并招募仍在妊娠中的妇女参加“死产”研究。这导致了研究问题“问最近经历过死产的女性参加研究是否合适?”以及“让孕妇参加研究与死胎有关的因素是否合适”。这项嵌套研究旨在描述参加MiNESS的妇女的观点,以探讨她们对以死产为重点的研究项目的看法和经验。在涉及MiNESS的单个研究地点进行了半结构式访谈。目的性抽样用于获得死产后接诊的妇女(病例n?=?6)和怀孕期间接生的妇女的样本(对照n?=?6)。根据两组妇女是否参加主要的MiNESS问卷调查研究与否,将两组妇女平均分配(每组n?=?3)。访谈数据被转录并使用主题分析法进行分析,以确定确定妇女是否参与MiNESS的最重要因素。分析得出以下主题:参与者对研究的理解;研究人员的方法;想要帮助;死产禁忌。这些主题在稿件中进行了单独探讨。与会者报告了对研究和以前参与研究的积极看法。受访者重视他们已经认识的工作人员的初步方法。死产的禁忌对一些正在进行怀孕的妇女来说是一个障碍。 MiNESS研究的参与者和非参与者之间关于研究的经验和观点都不同。参加者报告对临床研究的重要性和意义有了更深入的了解。在设计未来的研究时,应考虑方法的时机,信息的清晰性以及接近潜在参与者的人员,以优化招聘。 NCT02025530注册日期:2014年1月1日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号