首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Key components of early intervention programs for preterm infants and their parents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Key components of early intervention programs for preterm infants and their parents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:早产儿及其父母的早期干预计划的关键组成部分:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundPreterm infants are at greater risk for neurodevelopmental disabilities than full term infants. Interventions supporting parents to improve the quality of the infant’s environment should improve developmental outcomes for preterm infants. Many interventions that involve parents do not measure parental change, nor is it clear which intervention components are associated with improved parental outcomes. The aim of this review was to categorize the key components of early intervention programs and determine the direct effects of components on parents, as well as their preterm infants.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched between 1990 and December 2011. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included an early intervention for preterm infants, involved parents, and had a community component. Of 2465 titles and abstracts identified, 254 full text articles were screened, and 18 met inclusion criteria. Eleven of these studies reported maternal outcomes of stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, self-efficacy, and sensitivity/responsiveness in interactions with the infant. Meta-analyses using a random effects model were conducted with these 11 studies.ResultsInterventions employed multiple components categorized as (a) psychosocial support, (b) parent education, and/or (c) therapeutic developmental interventions targeting the infant. All interventions used some form of parenting education. The reporting quality of most trials was adequate, and the risk of bias was low based on the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Meta-analyses demonstrated limited effects of interventions on maternal stress (Z = 0.40, p = 0.69) and sensitivity/responsiveness (Z = 1.84, p = 0.07). There were positive pooled effects of interventions on maternal anxiety (Z = 2.54, p = 0.01), depressive symptoms (Z = 4.04, p ConclusionsPositive and clinically meaningful effects of early interventions were seen in some psychosocial aspects of mothers of preterm infants. This review was limited by the heterogeneity of outcome measures and inadequate reporting of statistics.Implications of key findingsInterventions for preterm infants and their mothers should consider including psychosocial support for mothers. If the intervention involves mothers, outcomes for both mothers and preterm infants should be measured to better understand the mechanisms for change.
机译:背景早产儿比足月儿患神经发育障碍的风险更大。支持父母改善婴儿环境质量的干预措施应改善早产儿的发育结局。许多涉及父母的干预措施无法衡量父母的变化,也不清楚哪些干预措施成分与改善父母的结局有关。这项审查的目的是对早期干预计划的关键组成部分进行分类,并确定这些组成部分对父母及其早产儿的直接影响。方法检索1990年之间的MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,ERIC和Cochrane系统评价数据库和2011年12月。符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT)包括对早产儿,涉及父母的婴儿进行早期干预,并具有社区组成部分。在2465个标题和摘要中,筛选了254个全文文章,其中18个符合纳入标准。其中有11项研究报告了母亲在与婴儿互动时的压力,焦虑,抑郁症状,自我效能以及敏感性/反应性的预后。对这11项研究使用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析。结果干预措施采用了多个成分,包括(a)社会心理支持,(b)父母教育和/或(c)针对婴儿的治疗性发展干预措施。所有干预措施都采用了某种形式的育儿教育。大多数临床试验的报告质量都很好,基于Cochrane协作工具,偏倚风险低。荟萃分析显示干预措施对产妇压力(Z = 0.40,p = 0.69)和敏感性/反应性(Z = 1.84,p = 0.07)的作用有限。干预对产妇焦虑(Z = 2.54,p = 0.01),抑郁症状(Z = 4.04,p)有积极的综合作用结论结论早产母亲的心理社会方面对早期干预有积极的临床意义。主要发现的意义早产儿及其母亲的干预措施应考虑包括对母亲的社会心理支持;如果干预措施涉及母亲,则应衡量母亲和早产儿的结局以更好地进行治疗。了解变化的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号