首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pediatrics >Clinical utility of antinuclear antibody tests in children
【24h】

Clinical utility of antinuclear antibody tests in children

机译:儿童抗核抗体检测的临床应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Antinuclear antibody (ANA) tests are frequently used to screen children for chronic inflammatory diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the diagnostic utility of this test is limited because of the large number of healthy children who have low-titer positive tests. We sought to determine the clinical utility of ANA tests in screening children for rheumatic disease and to determine whether there are specific signs or symptoms that enhance the clinical utility of ANA tests in children. Methods We undertook a retrospective analysis of 509 new patient referrals. Charts of patients referred because of results of ANA testing were selected for further analysis. Children with JRA, SLE, and other conditions were compared using demographic data, chief complaints at the time of presentation, and ANA titers. Results One hundred ten patients were referred because of an ANA test interpreted as positive. Ten patients were subsequently diagnosed with SLE. In addition, we identified one patient with mixed connective tissue disease, and an additional child with idiopathic Raynaud's phenomenon. Eighteen children of the children referred for a positive ANA test had juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). Another 80 children with positive ANA tests were identified, the majority of whom (n = 39, 49%) had musculoskeletal pain syndromes. Neither the presence nor the titer of ANA served to distinguish children with JRA from children with other musculoskeletal conditions. Children with JRA were readily identified on the basis of the history and physical examination. Children with SLE were therefore compared with children with positive ANA tests who did not have JRA, designated the "comparison group." Non-urticarial rash was more common in children with SLE than in children without chronic inflammatory disease (p = 0.007). Children with SLE were also older (mean ± sd = 14.2 ± 2.5 years) than the comparison group (11.0 ± 3.6 years; p = 0.001). ANA titer was also a significant discriminator between children with SLE and children without chronic inflammatory disease. The median ANA titer in children with SLE was 1: 1,080 compared with 1:160 for other children (p Conclusion Age and ANA titer assist in discriminating children with SLE from children with other conditions. ANA tests are of no diagnostic utility in either making or excluding the diagnosis of JRA.
机译:背景技术抗核抗体(ANA)测试通常用于筛查儿童的慢性炎症疾病,例如系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)。然而,由于大量健康儿童的低滴度阳性检测结果,该检测方法的诊断用途受到限制。我们试图确定ANA测试在筛查风湿性疾病儿童中的临床效用,并确定是否存在增强ANA测试在儿童中临床效用的特定体征或症状。方法我们对509例新患者转诊进行了回顾性分析。选择了由于ANA测试结果而转诊的患者图表以进行进一步分析。使用人口统计学数据,报告时的主要主诉以及ANA滴度对患有JRA,SLE和其他疾病的儿童进行了比较。结果ANA试验将110例患者转诊为阳性。随后有十名患者被诊断患有SLE。此外,我们确定了一名患有混合性结缔组织病的患者和另一名患有特发性雷诺现象的儿童。 ANA试验阳性的儿童中有18名儿童患有青少年类风湿关节炎(JRA)。确定了另外80名ANA测试阳性的儿童,其中大多数(n = 39,49%)患有肌肉骨骼疼痛综合征。 ANA的存在或滴度都无法将JRA儿童与其他肌肉骨骼疾病儿童区分开。根据病史和体格检查可以容易地识别出患有JRA的儿童。因此,将SLE患儿与ANA试验阳性但没有JRA的患儿(称为“比较组”)进行了比较。与没有慢性炎性疾病的儿童相比,SLE儿童的非荨麻疹较常见(p = 0.007)。 SLE患儿也比对照组(11.0±3.6岁; p = 0.001)大(平均±标准偏差= 14.2±2.5岁)。 ANA滴度也是区分SLE儿童和非慢性炎症性疾病儿童的重要因素。 SLE患儿的ANA滴度中位数为1:180,而其他患儿为1:160(p结论年龄和ANA滴度有助于将SLE患儿与其他状况的患儿区分开。不包括JRA的诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号