首页> 外文期刊>BMC Neurology >Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries: Review and protocol for a diagnostic study
【24h】

Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries: Review and protocol for a diagnostic study

机译:超声诊断双侧超声再狭窄的最佳临界标准:颈动脉狭窄再狭窄的诊断研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Carotid angioplasty with stenting is a relatively new, increasingly used, less-invasive treatment for the treatment of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. It is being evaluated in ongoing and nearly finished randomized trials. An important factor in the evaluation of stents is the occurrence of in-stent restenosis. An un-stented carotid artery is likely to have a more elastic vessel wall than a stented one, even if stenosis is present. Therefore, duplex ultrasound cut-off criteria for the degrees of an in-stent stenosis, based on blood velocity parameters, are probably different from the established cut-offs used for un-stented arteries. Routine criteria can not be applied to stented arteries but new criteria need to be established for this particular purpose. Methods/Design Current literature was systematically reviewed. From the selected studies, the following data were extracted: publication year, population size, whether the study was prospective, duplex ultrasound cut-off criteria reported, which reference test was used, and if there was an indication for selection bias and for verification bias in particular. Previous studies often were retrospective, or the reference test (DSA or CTA) was carried out only when a patient was suspected of having restenosis at DUS, which may result in verification bias. Results In general, the velocity cut-off values for stenosis measurements in stented arteries were higher than those reported for unstented arteries. Previous studies often were retrospective, or the reference test (DSA or CTA) was carried out only when a patient was suspected of having restenosis at DUS, which may result in verification bias. Discussion To address the deficiencies of the existing studies, we propose a prospective cohort study nested within the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS), an international multi-centre trial in which over 1,700 patients have been randomised between stenting and CEA. In this cohort we will enrol a minimum of 300 patients treated with a stent. All patients undergo regular DUS examination at the yearly follow-up visit according to the ICSS protocol. To avoid verification bias, an additional computed tomography angiography (CTA) will be performed as a reference test in all consecutive patients, regardless of the degree of stenosis on the initial DUS test.
机译:背景技术采用支架置入术是治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄的一种相对较新的,使用越来越少的侵入性较小的治疗方法。正在进行和接近完成的随机试验正在对其进行评估。评估支架的重要因素是支架内再狭窄的发生。即使存在狭窄,未支架的颈动脉也可能比带支架的颈动脉具有更大的弹性血管壁。因此,基于血流速度参数的支架内狭窄程度的双工超声截止标准可能与用于非支架动脉的已建立的截止标准不同。常规标准不能应用于覆膜动脉,但需要为此特定目的建立新的标准。方法/设计对现有文献进行了系统的综述。从选定的研究中,提取以下数据:出版年份,人口规模,研究是否为前瞻性,已报告的双工超声截止标准,使用了哪种参考测试以及是否有选择偏倚和验证偏倚的迹象尤其是。以前的研究通常是回顾性的,或者仅当怀疑患者在DUS处发生再狭窄时才进行参考测试(DSA或CTA),这可能导致验证偏倚。结果总体而言,在带支架的动脉中进行狭窄测量的速度截止值要高于未带支架的动脉所报道的速度截止值。以前的研究通常是回顾性的,或者仅当怀疑患者在DUS处发生再狭窄时才进行参考测试(DSA或CTA),这可能导致验证偏倚。讨论为了解决现有研究的不足,我们提出了一项前瞻性队列研究,该研究嵌套在国际颈动脉支架研究(ICSS)中,该研究是一项国际性多中心试验,其中1,700例患者被随机分配在支架和CEA之间。在这个队列中,我们将招募至少300名接受支架治疗的患者。所有患者均按照ICSS协议在每年的随访中接受定期DUS检查。为了避免验证偏差,无论初始DUS检查的狭窄程度如何,所有连续的患者都将进行额外的CT血管造影(CTA)作为参考检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号