...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Accuracy of magnetic resonance studies in the detection of chondral and labral lesions in femoroacetabular impingement: systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Accuracy of magnetic resonance studies in the detection of chondral and labral lesions in femoroacetabular impingement: systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:磁共振研究在检测股骨髋臼撞击中的软骨和唇部病变中的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Several types of Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly used in imaging of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), however till now there are no clear protocols and recommendations for each type. The aim of this meta-analysis is to detect the accuracy of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), direct magnetic resonance arthrography (dMRA) and indirect magnetic resonance arthrography (iMRA) in the diagnosis of chondral and labral lesions in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Methods A literature search was finalized on the 17th of May 2016 to collect all studies identifying the accuracy of cMRI, dMRA and iMRA in diagnosing chondral and labral lesions associated with FAI using surgical results (arthroscopic or open) as a reference test. Pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals using a random-effects meta-analysis for MRI, dMRA and iMRA were calculated also area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was retrieved whenever possible where AUC is equivocal to diagnostic accuracy. Results The search yielded 192 publications which were reviewed according inclusion and exclusion criteria then 21 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria for the qualitative analysis with a total number of 828 cases, lastly 12 studies were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that as regard labral lesions the pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC for cMRI were 0.864, 0.833 and 0.88 and for dMRA were 0.91, 0.58 and 0.92. While in chondral lesions the pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC for cMRI were 0.76, 0.72 and 0.75 and for dMRA were 0.75, 0.79 and 0.83, while for iMRA were sensitivity of 0.722 and specificity of 0.917. Conclusions The present meta-analysis showed that the diagnostic test accuracy was superior for dMRA when compared with cMRI for detection of labral and chondral lesions. The diagnostic test accuracy was superior for labral lesions when compared with chondral lesions in both cMRI and dMRA. Promising results are obtained concerning iMRA but further studies still needed to fully assess its diagnostic accuracy.
机译:背景技术股骨髋臼撞击(FAI)成像通常使用几种类型的磁共振成像(MRI),但是迄今为止,每种类型都没有明确的协议和建议。这项荟萃分析的目的是检测常规磁共振成像(cMRI),直接磁共振关节造影(dMRA)和间接磁共振关节造影(iMRA)在诊断股骨髋臼撞击(FAI)的软骨和唇部病变中的准确性。方法于2016年5月17日完成文献检索,收集所有研究,鉴定cMRI,dMRA和iMRA在以手术结果(关节镜或开放式)作为参考检验诊断与FAI相关的软骨和阴唇病变方面的准确性。使用随机效应荟萃分析对MRI,dMRA和iMRA进行荟萃分析,以95%置信区间合并敏感性和特异性,并在可能的情况下获取接收器工作特征(ROC)曲线(AUC)下的面积,而AUC等同于诊断准确性。结果检索产生192篇出版物,按照纳入和排除标准进行审查,然后有21项研究符合定性分析的资格标准,总共828例,最后12项研究纳入了定量荟萃分析。荟萃分析显示,对于唇部病变,cMRI的合并敏感性,特异性和AUC为0.864、0.833和0.88,dMRA为0.91、0.58和0.92。在软骨病变中,cMRI的综合敏感性,特异性和AUC为0.76、0.72和0.75,dMRA的综合敏感性,特异性和AUC为0.75、0.79和0.83,而iMRA的综合敏感性,特异性和AUC为0.722,特异性为0.917。结论目前的荟萃分析表明,与cMRI相比,dMRA的诊断测试准确性优于cMRI来检测唇和软骨病变。在cMRI和dMRA中,唇部病变的诊断测试准确性均优于软骨病变。关于iMRA,已经获得了可喜的结果,但仍需要进一步的研究以全面评估其诊断准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号