首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nephrology >Treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing hemodialysis: case report of two patients and short literature review
【24h】

Treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing hemodialysis: case report of two patients and short literature review

机译:转移性肾细胞癌血液透析患者的治疗:两名患者的病例报告及简短文献复习

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may involve both kidneys. When bilateral nephrectomy is necessary renal replacement therapy is mandatory. Treating such patients with sequential therapy based on cytokines, antiangiogenic factors and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors is challenging. Case presentation The first case, a 50-year-old Caucasian female, underwent a radical right nephrectomy for RCC. Twelve years later she underwent a radical left nephrectomy along with total hysterectomy including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for RCC involving the right kidney and ovary. Hemodialysis was necessary because of bilateral nephrectomy. She relapsed with pulmonary metastases and enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes and received cytokine based therapy along with bevacizumab. Therapy was discontinued despite the partial response because of hemorrhagic gastritis. Therapy was switched to an antiangiogenic factor but the patient manifested a parietal brain hematoma and stopped therapy. Subsequently disease relapsed with malignant pleural effusion and pulmonary nodules and a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor was administered which was withdrawn only at patient’s deteriorating performance status. The patient died of the disease 13?years after the initial diagnosis of RCC. The second case, a 51-year-old, Caucasian male, underwent a radical right nephrectomy for a chromophobe RCC. Six months later he underwent a radical left nephrectomy for RCC that proved to be a clear cell RCC. Due to bilateral nephrectomy hemodialysis was obligatory. Following disease recurrence at the anatomical bed of the right kidney therapy with antiangiogenic factor was administered which led to disease regression. However the patient experienced a left temporal-occipital brain hematoma. A radical excision of the recurrence which histologically proved to be a chromophobe RCC was not achieved and the patient received mTOR inhibitor which led to disease complete response. Nine years after the initial diagnosis of RCC he is disease free and leads an active life. Conclusion Patients with RCC are in significant risk to manifest bilateral disease. Renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis poses therapeutic challenges. Clinicians must be aware of the antiangiogenic factors’ adverse effects, especially bleeding, that may manifest in higher frequency and more severe in this setting.
机译:背景肾细胞癌(RCC)可能涉及两个肾脏。当必须进行双侧肾切除术时,必须进行肾脏替代治疗。使用基于细胞因子,抗血管生成因子和雷帕霉素(mTOR)抑制剂的哺乳动物靶标的序贯疗法来治疗此类患者具有挑战性。病例介绍第一个病例是一名50岁的白人女性,接受了根治性肾癌根治术。十二年后,她接受了根治性左肾切除术以及全子宫切除术,其中包括针对右肾和卵巢的RCC的双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。由于双侧肾切除术,必须进行血液透析。她因肺转移和纵隔淋巴结肿大而复发,并与贝伐单抗一起接受了基于细胞因子的治疗。尽管由于出血性胃炎引起了部分反应,但仍终止了治疗。疗法改为抗血管生成因子,但患者表现出顶叶脑血肿并停止治疗。随后疾病复发,并伴有恶性胸腔积液和肺结节,并给予哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶标,仅在患者病情恶化时才撤回。最初诊断为RCC后13年,患者死于该病。第二例是一名51岁的白人男性,因发色团RCC接受了根治性右肾切除术。六个月后,他接受了根治性肾癌根治术,证明是透明细胞癌。由于双侧肾切除术,必须进行血液透析。在右肾的解剖床疾病复发后,给予抗血管生成因子治疗,导致疾病消退。然而,患者经历了左颞枕脑血肿。未从组织学上证明是发色性RCC的根治术彻底切除,患者接受了mTOR抑制剂,导致疾病完全缓解。最初诊断为RCC后的九年,他没有疾病,过着积极的生活。结论RCC患者有明显的双侧疾病风险。要求血液透析的肾功能不全带来治疗挑战。临床医生必须意识到抗血管生成因子的不良反应,尤其是出血,在这种情况下可能以更高的频率出现并且更严重。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号