...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain
【24h】

The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain

机译:在有或没有颈部疼痛的患者中进行五项临床肌肉性能测试的评分者内和评分者间可靠性

获取原文

摘要

Background This study investigates the reliability of muscle performance tests using cost- and time-effective methods similar to those used in clinical practice. When conducting reliability studies, great effort goes into standardising test procedures to facilitate a stable outcome. Therefore, several test trials are often performed. However, when muscle performance tests are applied in the clinical setting, clinicians often only conduct a muscle performance test once as repeated testing may produce fatigue and pain, thus variation in test results. We aimed to investigate whether cervical muscle performance tests, which have shown promising psychometric properties, would remain reliable when examined under conditions similar to those of daily clinical practice. Methods The intra-rater (between-day) and inter-rater (within-day) reliability was assessed for five cervical muscle performance tests in patients with (n?=?33) and without neck pain (n?=?30). The five tests were joint position error, the cranio-cervical flexion test, the neck flexor muscle endurance test performed in supine and in a 45°-upright position and a new neck extensor test. Results Intra-rater reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect agreement for joint position error (ICC?≥?0.48-0.82), the cranio-cervical flexion test (ICC?≥?0.69), the neck flexor muscle endurance test performed in supine (ICC?≥?0.68) and in a 45°-upright position (ICC?≥?0.41) with the exception of a new test (neck extensor test), which ranged from slight to moderate agreement (ICC?=?0.14-0.41). Likewise, inter-rater reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect agreement for joint position error (ICC?≥?0.51-0.75), the cranio-cervical flexion test (ICC?≥?0.85), the neck flexor muscle endurance test performed in supine (ICC?≥?0.70) and in a 45°-upright position (ICC?≥?0.56). However, only slight to fair agreement was found for the neck extensor test (ICC?=?0.19-0.25). Conclusions Intra- and inter-rater reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect agreement with the exception of a new test (neck extensor test), which ranged from slight to moderate agreement. The significant variability observed suggests that tests like the neck extensor test and the neck flexor muscle endurance test performed in a 45°-upright position are too unstable to be used when evaluating neck muscle performance.
机译:背景技术这项研究使用与临床实践相似的具有成本效益和时间效益的方法来研究肌肉性能测试的可靠性。在进行可靠性研究时,会付出巨大的努力来标准化测试程序,以促进结果的稳定。因此,经常进行几次测试试验。但是,当在临床环境中应用肌肉性能测试时,临床医生通常只进行一次肌肉性能测试,因为重复测试可能会产生疲劳和疼痛,因此测试结果会有所不同。我们的目的是调查在与日常临床实践相似的条件下进行检查时,已显示出令人振奋的心理测量特性的子宫颈肌肉性能测试是否仍然可靠。方法对(n?=?33)无颈痛(n?=?30)的患者进行五项子宫颈肌肉性能测试,评估评定者之间(一天之间)和评定者间(一天之内)的可靠性。这五项测试分别是关节位置错误,颅颈屈曲测试,仰卧和45°直立姿势进行的颈部屈肌耐力测试以及新的颈部伸肌测试。结果评分者的信度在关节位置误差(ICC≥≥0.48-0.82),颅颈屈曲试验(ICC≥≥0.69),仰卧位颈屈肌耐力试验中处于中等至几乎完美的一致性。 ICC≥0.68),并且处于45°直立位置(ICC≥0.41),但新的测试(颈伸肌测试)除外,该测试的范围从轻微到中等(ICC≥0.14-0.41) 。同样,评估者之间的可靠性在关节位置误差(ICC≥≥0.51-0.75),颅颈屈曲试验(ICC≥≥0.85),仰卧位颈屈肌耐力试验的中等至几乎完美的范围内(ICC≥≥0.70)并处于45°直立位置(ICC≥≥0.56)。然而,对于颈部伸肌测试,仅发现轻微至公平的一致性(ICC = 0.19-0.25)。结论评分者内部和评分者之间的信度介于中等至几乎完美的一致性之间,但新的测试(颈部伸张肌测验)除外,其信度范围为轻微至中等。观察到的显着差异表明,在45°直立位置执行的诸如颈部伸肌测试和颈部屈肌耐力测试等测试过于不稳定,无法在评估颈部肌肉性能时使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号