首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Nonoperative, open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis in the treatment of Lisfranc injuries: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial – study protocol
【24h】

Nonoperative, open reduction and internal fixation or primary arthrodesis in the treatment of Lisfranc injuries: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial – study protocol

机译:非手术,切开复位内固定术或原发性关节固定术治疗Lisfranc损伤:一项前瞻性,随机,多中心试验–研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Lisfranc injuries are known to be rare and often overlooked injuries that can cause long-term disability and pain when missed or treated incorrectly. The wide variety of Lisfranc injuries ranges from subtle ligament distensions to open fracture dislocations. The treatment of Lisfranc joint injuries is still controversial and very little is known about what types of injury can be treated nonoperatively. The current literature provides only two randomized studies on dislocated Lisfranc injuries. These studies have shown that primary arthrodesis (PA) leads to a similar or better outcome and results in fewer secondary operations when compared with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in ligamentous injuries. There have been no previous randomized studies of the nonoperative versus operative treatment of Lisfranc injuries. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the operative and nonoperative treatment of non-dislocated Lisfranc injuries and to compare the ORIF and PA treatment of dislocated Lisfranc injuries. This study is a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. The trial comprises two strata: Stratum I compares cast-immobilization versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) treatment of non-dislocated Lisfranc joint injuries. Stratum II compares PA versus ORIF in the treatment of dislocated injuries of the Lisfranc joint. The main hypothesis of stratum I is that the nonoperative treatment of non-dislocated Lisfranc injuries achieves a similar outcome compared with operative treatment (ORIF). The hypothesis of stratum II is that PA of dislocated Lisfranc injuries yields a similar functional outcome compared with ORIF, but that PA results in fewer secondary operations than ORIF. The main outcome measure is the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Midfoot score and the secondary outcome measures are Visual-Analogue-Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA), Visual-Analogue-Scale (VAS), rate of secondary operations and other treatment-related complications. The results will be analyzed after the 2-year follow-up period. This publication presents a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial study protocol. It provides details of patient flow, randomization, aftercare and methods of analysis of the material and ways to present and publish the results. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02953067 24.10.2016.
机译:Lisfranc伤害很少见,经常被忽略,如果错过或治疗不当,可能导致长期的残疾和疼痛。 Lisfranc损伤的范围很广,从细微的韧带扩张到开放性骨折脱位。 Lisfranc关节损伤的治疗仍存在争议,对于哪种类型的损伤可以非手术治疗的知之甚少。当前文献仅对脱位的Lisfranc损伤提供了两项随机研究。这些研究表明,与韧带损伤的切开复位内固定术(ORIF)相比,原发性关节固定术(PA)导致相似或更好的结果,并减少了二次手术。以前尚无关于Lisfranc损伤的非手术治疗与手术治疗的随机研究。因此,本研究的目的是比较非脱位Lisfranc损伤的手术和非手术治疗,并比较ORIF和PA对脱位Lisfranc损伤的治疗。这项研究是一项前瞻性,随机,国家多中心试验。该试验包括两个层次:第I层比较石膏固定与切开复位和内固定(ORIF)治疗未脱位的Lisfranc关节损伤。 Stratum II将PA与ORIF进行了Lisfranc关节脱位损伤的治疗比较。 I层的主要假设是,非手术性Lisfranc损伤的非手术治疗与手术治疗(ORIF)取得了相似的结果。 II层的假设是Lisfranc脱位损伤的PA与ORIF相比可产生相似的功能结果,但PA导致的二次手术少于ORIF。主要结局指标是美国骨科足踝协会(AOFAS)中足评分,次要结局指标是视觉和模拟尺脚踝(VAS-FA),视觉-模拟量表(VAS),二次手术率和其他与治疗相关的并发症。在2年的随访期后将对结果进行分析。该出版物提出了一项前瞻性,随机,国家多中心试验研究方案。它提供了详细的患者流程,随机分组,后续护理以及材料分析方法以及呈现和发布结果的方法。 ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02953067 2016年10月24日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号