首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Methods for?trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): a protocol
【24h】

Methods for?trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): a protocol

机译:推荐营养建议的方法NutriRECS(营养建议和可取证据汇总,由系统评价组成):协议

获取原文
       

摘要

Recent systematic reviews and editorials suggest that many organizations that produce nutritional guideline recommendations do not adhere to internationally recognized standards set forth by the Institute of Medicine (IoM), Guidelines International Network (GIN), Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE), and Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). The potential solution is an independent group with content expertise and skilled in the methodology of systematic reviews and practice guidelines to produce trustworthy guideline recommendations, recommendations that are supported by publication in a top tier journal. The BMJ Rapid Recommendations project has recently demonstrated the feasibility and utility of this approach. Here, we are proposing trustworthy nutritional guideline recommendations based on internationally accepted guideline development standards, recommendations that will be informed by?rigorous and novel systematic reviews of the benefits and?harms?associated with nutritional exposures, as well as studies on the values and preferences related to dietary behaviors among members of the international community. Adhering to international guideline standards, conducting high quality systematic reviews, and actively assessing the values and preferences of key stakeholders is expected to improve the quality of nutritional guidelines and their relevance to end-users, particularly patients and community members. We will send our work for peer review, and if found acceptable, we will publish our nutritional recommendations in top-tier general medicine journals.
机译:最近的系统评价和社论表明,许多提出营养指南建议的组织均未遵循医学研究所(IoM),指南国际网络(GIN),指南研究与评估评估(AGREE)和分级建议,评估,开发和评估(GRADE)。潜在的解决方案是一个独立的小组,该小组具有内容专业知识和熟练的系统评价方法和实践指南,以产生可信赖的指南建议,这些建议得到顶级期刊的支持。 BMJ快速建议项目最近证明了这种方法的可行性和实用性。在此,我们根据国际公认的准则制定标准,提出可信赖的营养准则建议,这些建议将通过对营养暴露相关的益处和危害进行严格而新颖的系统评价,以及对价值和偏好的研究来提供与国际社会成员的饮食行为有关。遵守国际准则标准,进行高质量的系统审查以及积极评估关键利益相关者的价值观和偏好,有望改善营养准则的质量及其与最终用户(尤其是患者和社区成员)的相关性。我们会将我们的工作发送给同行评审,如果被接受,我们将在顶级普通医学杂志上发表营养建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号