首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medicine >Studying technology use as social practice: the untapped potential of ethnography
【24h】

Studying technology use as social practice: the untapped potential of ethnography

机译:研究技术作为社会实践的使用:人种学的未开发潜力

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Information and communications technologies (ICTs) in healthcare are often introduced with expectations of higher-quality, more efficient, and safer care. Many fail to meet these expectations. We argue here that the well-documented failures of ICTs in healthcare are partly attributable to the philosophical foundations of much health informatics research. Positivistic assumptions underpinning the design, implementation and evaluation of ICTs (in particular the notion that technology X has an impact which can be measured and reproduced in new settings), and the deterministic experimental and quasi-experimental study designs which follow from these assumptions, have inherent limitations when ICTs are part of complex social practices involving multiple human actors. We suggest that while experimental and quasi-experimental studies have an important place in health informatics research overall, ethnography is the preferred methodological approach for studying ICTs introduced into complex social systems. But for ethnographic approaches to be accepted and used to their full potential, many in the health informatics community will need to revisit their philosophical assumptions about what counts as research rigor.
机译:医疗保健中的信息和通信技术(ICT)通常是在期望获得更高质量,更有效和更安全的护理的情况下引入的。许多人没有达到这些期望。我们在这里认为,信息通信技术在医疗保健方面的有据可查的失败部分归因于许多健康信息学研究的哲学基础。信息通信技术的设计,实施和评估的实证性假设(特别是技术X具有可以在新的环境中进行衡量和再现的影响的观念)以及基于这些假设的确定性实验和准实验研究设计ICT是涉及多个人类行为者的复杂社会实践的一部分时的固有局限性。我们建议,尽管实验研究和准实验研究在整体卫生信息学研究中具有重要地位,但人种学是研究引入复杂社会系统的ICT的首选方法。但是,要使人种学方法得到充分利用并发挥其全部潜能,健康信息学界的许多人将需要重新审视其关于什么是严格研究的哲学假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号