...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Evaluation of the effects of an offer of a monetary incentive on the rate of questionnaire return during follow-up of a clinical trial: a randomised study within a trial
【24h】

Evaluation of the effects of an offer of a monetary incentive on the rate of questionnaire return during follow-up of a clinical trial: a randomised study within a trial

机译:在临床试验的后续过程中评估提供金钱奖励对问卷返回率的影响:试验中的一项随机研究

获取原文

摘要

Background A systematic review on the use of incentives to promote questionnaire return in clinical trials suggest they are effective, but not all studies have sufficient funds to use them. Promising an incentive once data are returned can reduce the cost-burden of this approach, with possible further cost-savings if the offer were restricted to reminder letters only. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of promising a monetary incentive at first mailout versus a promise on reminder letters only. Methods This was a randomised Study Within A Trial (SWAT) nested within BUMPES, a multicentre randomised controlled trial of maternal position in the late stage of labour in women with an epidural. The follow-up questionnaire asked for information on the women’s health, wellbeing and health service use one year following the birth of their baby. Women who consented to be contacted were randomised to a promise of a monetary incentive at first mailout or a promise on reminder letters only. Women were given an option of completing the questionnaire on paper or on online. The incentive was posted out on receipt of a completed questionnaire. The primary outcome was the overall return rate, and secondary outcomes were the return rate without any chasing from the study office, and the total cost of the vouchers. Results A total of 1,029 women were randomised, 508 to the first mailout group and 518 to the reminder group. There was no evidence to suggest a difference between groups in the overall return rate (adjusted RR 1.03 (95?% CI 0.96 to 1.11), however the proportion returned without chasing was higher in the first mailout group (adjusted RR 1.22, 95?% CI 1.07 to 1.39). The total cost of the vouchers per participant was higher in the first mailout group (mean difference £4.56, 95?% CI £4.02 to £5.11). Conclusions Offering a monetary incentive when a reminder is required could be cost-effective depending on the sample size of the study and the resources available to administer the reminder letters. Trial registration The BUMPES Trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN35706297 , 26th August 2009.
机译:背景一项对在临床试验中使用奖励措施促进问卷返回的激励措施的系统评价表明,这些措施是有效的,但并非所有研究都有足够的资金来使用它们。一旦数据返回,有希望采取激励措施,可以减少这种方法的负担,如果报价仅限于提醒函件,则可以进一步节省成本。这项研究旨在评估在首次寄出邮件时承诺金钱奖励与仅在催函中承诺的效果。方法这是一项嵌套在BUMPES内的随机试验研究(SWAT),该试验是硬膜外分娩妇女分娩后期产妇体位的多中心随机对照试验。后续调查表询问有关婴儿出生一年后妇女的健康,福祉和保健服务使用情况的信息。同意与之联系的妇女在第一次寄出时被随机分配给一个金钱奖励的承诺或仅在催函中承诺。妇女可以选择以纸质形式或在线填写调查表。奖励措施在收到完整的调查表后就发布了。主要结果是总体回报率,次要结果是没有研究办公室追逐的回报率以及代金券的总成本。结果共有1,029名女性被随机分组​​,第一批寄出的女性为508名,催促组为518名。没有证据表明两组之间的总体回报率存在差异(调整后的RR为1.03(95%CI为0.96至1.11),但是在第一批寄出组中不追逐的情况下返还的比例更高(调整后的RR 1.22为95%)。 CI 1.07至1.39)。在第一个寄出组中,每位参与者的代金券的总费用较高(平均差异£ 4.56,95%CI £ 4.02至£ 5.11)。结论可以在需要提醒时提供金钱奖励。具有成本效益,具体取决于研究的样本量和可用于管理提醒函的资源试行注册BUMPES试行已在当前控制的试行中进行注册:ISRCTN35706297,2009年8月26日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号