...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Cardiac auscultation training of medical students: a comparison of electronic sensor-based and acoustic stethoscopes
【24h】

Cardiac auscultation training of medical students: a comparison of electronic sensor-based and acoustic stethoscopes

机译:医学生的心脏听诊训练:基于电子传感器和声学听诊器的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background To determine whether the use of an electronic, sensor based stethoscope affects the cardiac auscultation skills of undergraduate medical students. Methods Forty eight third year medical students were randomized to use either an electronic stethoscope, or a conventional acoustic stethoscope during clinical auscultation training. After a training period of four months, cardiac auscultation skills were evaluated using four patients with different cardiac murmurs. Two experienced cardiologists determined correct answers. The students completed a questionnaire for each patient. The thirteen questions were weighted according to their relative importance, and a correct answer was credited from one to six points. Results No difference in mean score was found between the two groups (p = 0.65). Grading and characterisation of murmurs and, if present, report of non existing murmurs were also rated. None of these yielded any significant differences between the groups. Conclusion Whether an electronic or a conventional stethoscope was used during training and testing did not affect the students' performance on a cardiac auscultation test.
机译:背景技术为了确定使用基于传感器的电子听诊器是否会影响医学生的心脏听诊技能。方法在临床听诊训练中,将48名第三年级医学生随机分配使用电子听诊器或传统的声学听诊器。经过四个月的训练后,对四名患有不同心脏杂音的患者进行了心脏听诊技能评估。两名经验丰富的心脏病专家确定了正确答案。学生们为每位患者填写了一份问卷。根据相对重要性对13个问题进行加权,正确答案由1到6分。结果两组之间的平均得分没有差异(p = 0.65)。还对杂音的等级和特征以及不存在的杂音(如果存在)进行了评级。这些都没有在组之间产生任何显着差异。结论在培训和测试过程中使用电子听诊器还是常规听诊器都不会影响学生在心脏听诊测试中的表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号