...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Educational interventions to improve the effectiveness in clinical competence of general practitioners: problem-based versus critical reading-based learning
【24h】

Educational interventions to improve the effectiveness in clinical competence of general practitioners: problem-based versus critical reading-based learning

机译:为提高全科医生临床能力的有效性而进行的教育干预:基于问题的学习与基于批判性阅读的学习

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Evidence suggests that continuing medical education improves the clinical competence of general practitioners and the quality of health care services. Thus, we evaluated the relative impact of two educational strategies, critical reading (CR) and problem based learning (PBL), on the clinical competence of general practitioners in a healthcare system characterized by excessive workload and fragmentation into small primary healthcare centers. Methods Clinical competence was evaluated in general practitioners assigned to three groups based on the educational interventions used: 1) critical reading intervention; 2) problem based learning intervention; and 3) no intervention (control group, which continued clinical practice as normal). The effect on the clinical competence of general practitioners was evaluated in three dimensions: the cognitive dimension, via a self-administered questionnaire; the habitual behavioral dimension, via information from patient’s medical records; and the affective dimension, through interviews with patients. A paired Student′s t-test was used to evaluate the changes in the mean clinical competence scores before and after the intervention, and a 3 x 2 ANOVA was used to analyze groups, times and their interaction. Results Nine general practitioners participated in the critical reading workshop, nine in the problem-based learning workshop, and ten were assigned to the control group. The participants exhibited no significant differences in clinical competence measures at baseline, or in socio-demographic or job characteristics (p > 0.05). Significant improvements in all three dimensions (cognitive, 45.67 vs 54.89; habitual behavioral, 53.78 vs 82.33; affective, 4.16 vs 4.76) were only observed in the problem-based learning group after the intervention (p > 0.017). Conclusions While no differences in post-intervention scores were observed between groups, we conclude that problem-based learning can be effective, particularly in a small-group context. Indeed, problem-based learning was the only strategy to induce a significant difference between pre– and post- intervention scores for all three CC dimensions.
机译:背景证据表明,继续医学教育可以提高全科医生的临床能力和医疗保健服务的质量。因此,我们评估了两种教育策略(批判性阅读(CR)和基于问题的学习(PBL))对全科医生在医疗系统中的临床能力的相对影响,该医疗系统的特点是工作量过多并且分散到小型初级医疗中心。方法根据所使用的教育干预措施,对被分为三组的全科医生进行临床能力评估:1)批判性阅读干预; 2)基于问题的学习干预; 3)不进行干预(对照组,该对照组继续正常进行临床实践)。从以下三个方面评估对全科医生临床能力的影响:通过自我管理的问卷调查的认知方面;以及通过患者病历中的信息得出习惯性行为维度;和情感层面,通过与患者的访谈。配对Student's t检验用于评估干预前后平均临床能力评分的变化,并使用3 x 2方差分析来分析组,时间及其相互作用。结果九名全科医生参加了批判性阅读研讨会,九名参加了基于问题的学习研讨会,十名被分配到对照组。参与者在基线时的临床能力测评,社会人口统计学或工作特征方面均无显着差异(p> 0.05)。仅在干预后基于问题的学习组中观察到所有三个方面的显着改善(认知,分别为45.67和54.89;习惯行为,分别为53.78和82.33;情感,分别为4.16和4.76)(p> 0.017)。结论虽然各组之间的干预后评分没有差异,但我们得出结论,基于问题的学习是有效的,尤其是在小团体的情况下。的确,基于问题的学习是在干预前和干预后所有三个CC维度上引起显着差异的唯一策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号