...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >Clinical effectiveness of rapid tests for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitalized patients: a systematic review
【24h】

Clinical effectiveness of rapid tests for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitalized patients: a systematic review

机译:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)快速检测在住院患者中的临床效果:系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are often resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics. The research objectives of this systematic review were to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) versus chromogenic agar for MRSA screening, and PCR versus no screening for several clinical outcomes, including MRSA colonization and infection rates. Methods An electronic literature search was conducted on studies evaluating polymerase chain reaction techniques and methicillin (also spelled meticillin) resistant Staphylococcus aureus that were published from 1993 onwards using Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, BIOSIS Previews, and EMBASE. Due to the presence of heterogeneity in the selected studies, the clinical findings of individual studies were described. Results Nine studies that compared screening for MRSA using PCR versus screening using chromogenic agar in a hospital setting, and two studies that compared screening using PCR with no or targeted screening were identified. Some studies found lower MRSA colonization and acquisition, infection, and transmission rates in screening with PCR versus screening with chromogenic agar, and the turnaround time for screening test results was lower for PCR. One study reported a lower number of unnecessary isolation days with screening using PCR versus screening with chromogenic agar, but the proportion of patients isolated was similar between both groups. The turnaround time for test results and number of isolation days were lower for PCR versus chromogenic agar for MRSA screening. Conclusions The use of PCR for MRSA screening demonstrated a lower turnaround time and number of isolation days compared with chromogenic agar. Given the mixed quality and number of studies (11 studies), gaps remain in the published literature and the evidence remains insufficient. In addition to screening, factors such as the number of contacts between healthcare workers and patients, number of patients attended by one healthcare worker per day, probability of colonization among healthcare workers, and MRSA status of hospital shared equipment and hospital environment must be considered to control the transmission of MRSA in a hospital setting.
机译:背景耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)通常对多种抗生素具有耐药性。该系统评价的研究目标是评估聚合酶链反应(PCR)与显色琼脂在MRSA筛查中的临床效果,以及PCR与无筛查对几种临床结果(包括MRSA定植和感染率)的临床效果。方法通过电子文献检索,对评价聚合酶链反应技术和耐甲氧西林(也称为美西林)的金黄色葡萄球菌的研究进行了评估,这些研究从1993年开始使用Medline,Medline进行中和其他非索引引文,BIOSIS Previews和EMBASE进行发表。由于所选研究中存在异质性,因此对单个研究的临床发现进行了描述。结果在医院环境中,有9项研究比较了使用PCR筛查MRSA和进行显色琼脂的筛查,以及两项比较了PCR筛查与无筛查或靶向筛查的研究。一些研究发现,与使用生色琼脂进行筛选相比,使用PCR进行筛选时,MRSA的定植和获取,感染和传播率较低,并且使用PCR筛选测试结果的周转时间较短。一项研究报告说,使用PCR进行筛查与使用生色琼脂进行筛查相比,不必要的分离天数更少,但是两组之间分离出的患者比例相似。 PCR的检测结果周转时间和分离天数比MRSA筛选的生色琼脂要短。结论与发色琼脂相比,使用PCR进行MRSA筛选显示出更短的周转时间和分离天数。由于研究的质量和数量参差不齐(11项研究),已发表的文献中仍存在空白,证据仍然不足。除了筛选外,还必须考虑以下因素,例如医护人员与患者之间的联系数量,每天一名医护人员所护理的患者数量,医护人员之间定植的可能性以及医院共享设备的MRSA状态和医院环境。在医院环境中控制MRSA的传播。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号