...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Medical students’ experiences of their own professional development during three clinical terms: a prospective follow-up study
【24h】

Medical students’ experiences of their own professional development during three clinical terms: a prospective follow-up study

机译:医学生在三个临床术语中的自身专业发展经历:前瞻性随访研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background A modern competency-based medical education is well implemented globally, but less is known about how the included learning activities contribute to medical students’ professional development. The aim of this study was to explore Swedish medical students’ perceptions of the offered learning activities and their experiences of how these activities were connected to their professional development as defined by the CanMEDS framework. Methods A prospective mixed method questionnaire study during three terms (internal medicine, scientific project, and surgery) in which data were collected by using contextual activity sampling system, i.e., the students were sent a questionnaire via their mobile phones every third week. All 136 medical students in the 6th of 11 terms in the autumn of 2012 were invited to participate. Seventy-four students (54%) filled in all of the required questionnaires (4 per term) for inclusion, the total number of questionnaires being 1335. The questionnaires focused on the students’ experiences of learning activities, especially in relation to the CanMEDS Roles, collaboration with others and emotions (positive, negative, optimal experiences, i.e., “flow”) related to the studies. The quantitative data was analysed statistically and, for the open-ended questions, manifest inductive content analysis was used. Results Three of the CanMEDs Roles, Medical Expert, Scholar, and Communicator, were most frequently reported while the four others, e.g., the role Health Advocate, were less common. Collaboration with students from other professions was most usual during the 8th term. Positive emotions and experience of “flow” were most often reported during clinical learning activities while the scientific project term was connected with more negative emotions. Conclusions Our results showed that it is possible, even during clinical courses, to visualise the different areas of professional competence defined in the curriculum and connect these competences to the actual learning activities. Students halfway through their medical education considered the most important learning activities for their professional development to be connected with the Roles of Medical Expert, Scholar, and Communicator. Given that each of the CanMEDS Roles is at least moderately important during undergraduate medical education, the entire spectrum of the Roles should be emphasised and developed during the clinical years.
机译:背景技术基于现代能力的医学教育在全球范围内得到了很好的实施,但是对于所包含的学习活动如何促进医学生的专业发展知之甚少。这项研究的目的是探讨瑞典医学生对所提供的学习活动的看法,以及他们对这些活动如何与CanMEDS框架所定义的专业发展相联系的经验。方法在前三个阶段(内科,科学项目和外科手术)进行的前瞻性混合方法问卷调查研究中,使用情境活动采样系统收集数据,即每三周通过手机向学生发送一次问卷调查。 2012年秋季,在11个学期中的6个学期中,所有136名医学生都被邀请参加。共有74名学生(54%)填写了所有必填的问卷(每学期4个),问卷总数为1335。这些问卷着重于学生的学习活动经历,尤其是与CanMEDS角色有关的学习经历,与他人的合作以及与研究相关的情绪(积极,消极,最佳体验,即“流动”)。对定量数据进行统计分析,对于不限成员名额的问题,使用明显的归纳含量分析。结果CanMEDs角色中的三个角色(医学专家,学者和沟通者)最常被报告,而其他四个角色(例如Health Advocate角色)则较少见。在第八学期中,与其他专业的学生进行合作最为普遍。在临床学习活动中,最经常报告的是积极情绪和“流动”经历,而科学项目术语则与更多负面情绪相关。结论我们的结果表明,即使在临床课程中,也可以可视化课程中定义的专业能力的不同领域,并将这些能力与实际的学习活动联系起来。在医学教育中期的学生认为,对于他们的专业发展而言,最重要的学习活动应与医学专家,学者和沟通者的角色联系起来。鉴于在本科医学教育中,每个CanMEDS角色至少都具有中等重要性,因此在临床期间应强调和发展整个角色范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号