...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in Chinese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a randomized controlled trial

机译:替加环素单药联合亚胺培南/西司他丁在中国复杂腹腔内感染患者中的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Tigecycline, a first-in-class broad-spectrum glycylcycline antibiotic, has broad-spectrum in vitro activity against bacteria commonly encountered in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), including aerobic and facultative Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobic bacteria. In the current trial, tigecycline was evaluated for safety and efficacy vs. imipenem/cilastatin in hospitalized Chinese patients with cIAIs. Methods In this phase 3, multicenter, open-label study, patients were randomly assigned to receive IV tigecycline or imipenem/cilastatin for ≤2 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoints were clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (12-37 days after therapy) for the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat and microbiologically evaluable populations. Because the study was not powered to demonstrate non-inferiority between tigecycline and imipenem/cilastatin, no formal statistical analysis was performed. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the response rates in each treatment group and for differences between treatment groups for descriptive purposes. Results One hundred ninety-nine patients received ≥1 dose of study drug and comprised the modified intent-to-treat population. In the microbiologically evaluable population, 86.5% (45 of 52) of tigecycline- and 97.9% (47 of 48) of imipenem/cilastatin-treated patients were cured at the test-of-cure assessment (12-37 days after therapy); in the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat population, cure rates were 81.7% (49 of 60) and 90.9% (50 of 55), respectively. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 80.4% for tigecycline vs. 53.9% after imipenem/cilastatin therapy (P P P = 0.005). Conclusions Clinical cure rates for tigecycline were consistent with those found in global cIAI studies. The overall safety profile was also consistent with that observed in global studies of tigecycline for treatment of cIAI, as well as that observed in analyses of Chinese patients in those studies; no novel trends were observed. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00136201
机译:背景技术Tigecycline是一种一流的广谱糖基环素抗生素,对复杂的腹腔内感染(cIAI)中常见的细菌具有广谱的体外活性,包括需氧性和兼性革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌以及厌氧菌菌。在本试验中,对住院的中国cIAI患者进行了替加环素相对于亚胺培南/西司他丁的安全性和有效性评估。方法在这个第3期,多中心,开放标签研究中,患者被随机分配接受tigecycline或亚胺培南/西司他丁IV≤2周。主要的疗效终点是针对经过微生物改良的意向治疗人群和具有微生物学评估价值的人群进行的就诊测试(治疗后12-37天)的临床反应。由于该研究无力证明替加环素与亚胺培南/西司他丁之间存在非劣效性,因此未进行正式的统计学分析。计算每个治疗组的缓解率和治疗组之间的差异,以达到95%置信区间(CIs)的双面,用于描述目的。结果199例患者接受了≥1剂量的研究药物,包括改良的意图治疗人群。在微生物学评估的人群中,经替加环素治疗的患者中有86.5%(52名患者中的45名)和接受亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗的患者中有97.9%(48名中的47名)在治愈率评估(治疗后12-37天)中治愈;在经微生物改良的意向性治疗人群中,治愈率分别为81.7%(60分的49)和90.9%(55分的50)。替加环素治疗后不良事件的总发生率为80.4%,而亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗后为53.9%(P P P = 0.005)。结论替加环素的临床治愈率与全球cIAI研究中发现的治愈率一致。总体安全性也与替加环素治疗cIAI的全球研究中观察到的以及在这些研究中对中国患者的分析中观察到的一致。没有观察到新颖的趋势。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00136201

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号