...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Geriatric assessment in undergraduate geriatric education – a structured interpretation guide improves the quantity and accuracy of the results: a cohort comparison
【24h】

Geriatric assessment in undergraduate geriatric education – a structured interpretation guide improves the quantity and accuracy of the results: a cohort comparison

机译:本科老年医学教育中的老年医学评估–结构化的解释指南可提高结果的数量和准确性:队列比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background With regard to the growing proportion of elderly multimorbid patients, a sound undergraduate geriatric education becomes more important. Therefore we included the execution and interpretation of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) into a mandatory two-week clerkship at a general practitioner's office. The present study examined the effect of a guide structuring the students’ considerations when interpreting a CGA on the quantity and accuracy of the documented findings and conclusions. Methods We compared random samples out of two cohorts of fourth-year medical students (interpreting the CGA with and without using the structured interpretation guide) completing their clerkship between April 2006 and March 2008 with regard to the content of the CGA interpretation and the grades the students achieved for their clerkship documentation, which were substantially determined by the quantity and accuracy of the documentation and interpretation of the CGA. Results The structured interpretation guide led to significantly more mentions of aspects that have to be considered in geriatric patient care and to a higher documentation rate of respective positive results. Furthermore, students who analysed the CGA by using the interpretation guide achieved significantly better grades. Conclusions An additional tool structuring medical students’ considerations when interpreting a CGA increases the quantity and the accuracy of the documented findings and conclusions. This may enhance the students’ learning gain.
机译:背景技术随着老年多病患者的比例不断增加,健全的老年医学教育变得越来越重要。因此,我们将综合老年医学评估(CGA)的执行和解释包括在全科医生办公室的强制性两周业务中。本研究检查了指导解释学生在解释CGA时对所记录的发现和结论的数量和准确性的考虑因素的影响。方法我们比较了2006年4月至2008年3月在其完成业务的两个四年级医学生队列(使用和不使用结构化解释指南的情况下对CGA进行解释)中的随机样本,以了解CGA解释的内容和成绩。学生获得的职员文件,在很大程度上取决于文件的数量和准确性以及对CGA的解释。结果结构化的解释指南导致对老年患者护理中必须考虑的各个方面的提及大大增加,并且各个阳性结果的文献记录率更高。此外,使用解释指南分析CGA的学生的成绩明显更好。结论解释CGA时,可以使用另一种工具来构造医学生的考虑因素,从而增加记录的发现和结论的数量并提高准确性。这可以提高学生的学习水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号