首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >The functional barometer –a self-report questionnaire in accordance with the international classification of functioning, disability and health for pain related problems; validity and patient-observer comparisons
【24h】

The functional barometer –a self-report questionnaire in accordance with the international classification of functioning, disability and health for pain related problems; validity and patient-observer comparisons

机译:功能晴雨表–一项针对疼痛相关问题的功能,残疾和健康国际分类的自我报告调查表;有效性和观察者比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, (ICF) provides a unified, international standardized framework for describing and classifying health and health-related functioning and disability. Based on an ICF core sets the Functional Barometer, (FB), was developed for assessments of perceived pain-related problems with functions, activity and quality-of-life by patients suffering from long-term pain. The aim was to evaluate the construct validity, and to compare the assessments of a patient’s problems from the perspectives of the patient and of the examining professional when using the validated FB and corresponding ICF-classification form, respectively. Methods Patients with long-term pain for more than 3?months that visited one of four pain clinics during specified time periods of data collections were eligible. The self-report Balanced Inventory for Spinal disorders was used for validation of the FB. Correspondingly to the validated FB an ICF-classification form for professional’s assessment was developed. The data sets for these inter-scale and the patient-professional comparisons were collected adjacent to the clinical examination. By the statistical method used for evaluation of the pairs of ordinal data presence of systematic disagreement was identified and measured separately from additional individual variations. Results The validation process resulted in a revised FB(2.0) that meets the requirements of good construct and content validity. The professionals’ ICF-classifications of the patients’ problems disagreed with the patients’ assessments on the FB(2.0); the percentage agreements ranged from 18% to 51%. The main reason was that the practitioners systematically underestimated the patients’ levels of problems but the different professionals contributed also to a large individual variability (noise) in assessment. Conclusions This study presents an ICF-based validated self-report questionnaire, The FB, to be used for identifying and describing pain-related problems with current functioning, activities and quality-of-life as perceived by patients suffering from long-term pain. The strong evidences of underestimation of the patients’ problems and the variability in the professionals’ ICF-classifications demonstrated the importance of describing the patient’s problems both from the patient’s and the professional’s perspective beneficial for the patient’s rehabilitation.
机译:背景技术国际功能,残疾与健康分类(ICF)提供了一个统一的国际标准化框架,用于描述和分类与健康相关的功能和残疾。基于ICF核心集,开发了功能晴雨表(FB),用于评估患有长期疼痛的患者与功能,活动和生活质量有关的疼痛相关问题。目的是评估构造的有效性,并分别在使用经过验证的FB和相应的ICF分类表时,从患者和检查专业人员的角度比较患者问题的评估。方法长期疼痛超过3个月的患者在指定的数据收集时间内到四家疼痛诊所之一就诊。自我报告的脊椎疾病平衡量表用于验证FB。与经过验证的FB相对应,开发了用于专业评估的ICF分类表。这些量表之间的数据集以及患者与专业之间的比较是在临床检查附近收集的。通过用于评估成对序数数据对的统计方法,系统性分歧的存在得以识别并与其他个体差异分开进行了测量。结果验证过程导致修订的FB(2.0)符合良好结构和内容有效性的要求。专业人员对患者问题的ICF分类与患者对FB(2.0)的评估不一致;协议百分比从18%到51%不等。主要原因是从业人员系统地低估了患者的问题水平,但不同的专业人员也对评估中的个体差异(噪声)做出了很大贡献。结论本研究提出了一种基于ICF的经过验证的自我报告调查表FB,可用于识别和描述与疼痛相关的问题,包括长期疼痛患者所感知的当前功能,活动和生活质量。有充分的证据表明,低估了患者的问题,并且专业人员的ICF分类存在差异,这表明从患者和专业人员的角度描述有益于患者康复的患者问题的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号