首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >How do NHS organisations plan research capacity development? Strategies, strengths, and opportunities for improvement
【24h】

How do NHS organisations plan research capacity development? Strategies, strengths, and opportunities for improvement

机译:NHS组织如何计划研究能力发展?策略,优势和改进机会

获取原文
           

摘要

Research that is integral into a ‘learning healthcare system’ can promote cost effective services and knowledge creation. As such, research is defined as a ‘core function’ in UK health service organisations, and is often planned through research and development (R&D) strategies that aim to promote research activity and research capacity development (RCD). The discussion focuses around the content of ten R&D strategies for healthcare organisations in England and Scotland, with respect to RCD. These organisations were engaged with a research interest network called ACORN (Addressing Organisational Capacity to do Research Network) that included two Scottish Health Boards, four community and mental health trusts, two provincial district hospitals, and two teaching hospitals. We undertook a thematic documentary analysis of the R&D strategies which identified 11 ‘core activities’ of RCD. The potential for building research capacity in these ‘core activities’ was established by reviewing them through the lens of a RCD framework. Core activities aimed to ‘hard wire’ RCD into health organisations. They demonstrated a complex interplay between developing a strong internal organisational infrastructure, and supporting individual career planning and skills development, in turn enabled by organisational processes. They also included activities to build stronger inter-organisational relationships and networks. Practitioner, manager and patient involvement was a cross cutting theme. The potential to demonstrate progress was included in plans through monitoring activity across all RCD principles. Strategies were primarily aimed at research production rather than research use. Developing ‘actionable dissemination’ was poorly addressed in the strategies, and represents an area for improvement. We describe strengths of RCD planning activities, and opportunities for improvement. We explore how national policy and research funders can influence health systems’ engagement in research.
机译:“学习医疗保健系统”中不可或缺的研究可以促进具有成本效益的服务和知识创造。因此,研究被定义为英国卫生服务组织的“核心职能”,并且通常通过旨在促进研究活动和研究能力发展(RCD)的研究与开发(R&D)策略进行规划。讨论的重点是针对RCD的英格兰和苏格兰医疗机构的十项R&D战略的内容。这些组织与一个名为ACORN(研究组织能力的研究网络)的研究兴趣网络合作,该网络包括两个苏格兰卫生委员会,四个社区和精神健康信托基金,两个省级医院和两个教学医院。我们对R&D战略进行了专题文献分析,确定了RCD的11个“核心活动”。通过在RCD框架的角度对这些“核心活动”进行研究,可以建立研究能力的潜力。旨在将刚果民盟“硬性联系”到卫生组织的核心活动。他们展示了开发强大的内部组织基础结构与支持个人职业生涯规划和技能发展之间的复杂相互作用,而组织流程又反过来又促进了个人职业生涯规划和技能发展。它们还包括建立更牢固的组织间关系和网络的活动。从业者,经理和患者的参与是一个跨领域的主题。通过监测所有RCD原则的活动,在计划中包括了证明进度的潜力。策略主要针对研究成果而不是研究用途。在策略中,发展“可操作的传播”的方法未得到很好的解决,这是一个需要改进的领域。我们描述了刚果民盟计划活动的优势以及改进的机会。我们探索国家政策和研究资助者如何影响卫生系统参与研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号