首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >A realist review of shared medical appointments: How, for whom, and under what circumstances do they work?
【24h】

A realist review of shared medical appointments: How, for whom, and under what circumstances do they work?

机译:对共享医疗任命的现实评论:他们如何工作,为谁服务以及在什么情况下工作?

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Shared medical appointments (SMAs) are doctor-patient visits in which groups of patients are seen by one or more health care providers in a concurrent session. There is a growing interest in understanding the potential benefits of SMAs in various contexts to improve clinical outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. This study builds upon the existing evidence base that suggests SMAs are indeed effective. In this study, we explored how they are effective in terms of the underlying mechanisms of action and under what circumstances. Methods Realist review methodology was used to synthesize the literature on SMAs, which included a broad search of 800+ published articles. 71 high quality primary research articles were retained to build a conceptual model of SMAs and 20 of those were selected for an in depth analysis using realist methodology (i.e.,middle-range theories and and context-mechanism-outcome configurations). Results Nine main mechanisms that serve to explain how SMAs work were theorized from the data immersion process and configured in a series of context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOs). These are: (1) Group exposure in SMAs combats isolation, which in turn helps to remove doubts about one’s ability to manage illness; (2) Patients learn about disease self-management vicariously by witnessing others’ illness experiences; (3) Patients feel inspired by seeing others who are coping well; (4) Group dynamics lead patients and providers to developing more equitable relationships; (5) Providers feel increased appreciation and rapport toward colleagues leading to increased efficiency; (6) Providers learn from the patients how better to meet their patients’ needs; (7) Adequate time allotment of the SMA leads patients to feel supported; (8) Patients receive professional expertise from the provider in combination with first-hand information from peers, resulting in more robust health knowledge; and (9) Patients have the opportunity to see how the physicians interact with fellow patients, which allows them to get to know the physician and better determine their level of trust. Conclusions Nine overarching mechanisms were configured in CMO configurations and discussed as a set of complementary middle-range programme theories to explain how SMAs work. It is anticipated that this innovative work in theorizing SMAs using realist review methodology will provide policy makers and SMA program planners adequate conceptual grounding to design contextually sensitive SMA programs in a wide variety of settings and advance an SMA research agenda for varied contexts.
机译:背景技术共享医疗约会(SMA)是指医患互访,其中一个或多个医疗服务提供者在同时进行的会议中会看到患者组。人们越来越了解SMA在各种情况下的潜在益处,以改善临床结果并降低医疗保健成本。这项研究建立在现有证据基础之上,表明SMA确实有效。在这项研究中,我们探讨了它们在潜在的作用机制以及在什么情况下如何有效。方法使用现实主义者的审查方法来合成有关SMA的文献,其中包括对800余篇已发表文章的广泛搜索。保留了71篇高质量的主要研究文章以构建SMA的概念模型,并选择了20篇文章进行了使用现实主义方法(即中程理论和情境机制-结果配置)的深入分析。结果从数据浸入过程中得出了用于解释SMA如何工作的九种主要机制,并以一系列上下文机制结果配置(CMO)进行了配置。它们是:(1)SMA中的集体暴露可以消除孤立感,从而有助于消除人们对疾病控制能力的怀疑; (2)患者通过目睹他人的疾病经历来替代性地学习疾病自我管理; (3)看到其他人应对得很好,患者会感到鼓舞; (4)群体动态导致患者和提供者建立更公平的关系; (5)提供者感到对同事的赞赏和融洽,从而提高了工作效率; (6)提供者向患者学习如何更好地满足患者的需求; (7)SMA足够的时间分配使患者感到受支持; (8)患者从提供者那里获得专业知识,并从同龄人那里获得第一手信息,从而获得更强大的健康知识; (9)患者有机会了解医生如何与其他患者互动,从而使他们认识医生并更好地确定他们的信任度。结论在CMO配置中配置了九种总体机制,并作为一组补充性的中端程序理论进行了讨论,以解释SMA如何工作。可以预期,这项使用现实主义审查方法对SMA进行理论化的创新工作将为政策制定者和SMA项目规划人员提供足够的概念基础,以便在各种情况下设计上下文相关的SMA计划,并推进SMA在不同背景下的研究议程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号