...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Implementation challenges in delivering team-based care (‘TEAMcare’) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a public hospital setting: a mixed methods approach
【24h】

Implementation challenges in delivering team-based care (‘TEAMcare’) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a public hospital setting: a mixed methods approach

机译:在公立医院中为慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者提供基于团队的护理(TEAMcare)的实施挑战:混合方法

获取原文

摘要

Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considered a multisystem disease, in which comorbidities feature prominently. COPD guidelines recommend holistic assessment and management of relevant comorbid diseases but there is limited information as to how this is best achieved. This pilot study aimed to explore the views of stakeholders, including patients and the healthcare team, on the feasibility, acceptability and barriers to a collaborative, multidisciplinary team-based care intervention (‘TEAMcare’) to improve health outcomes in COPD patients, within the context of a local hospital outpatient clinic. Methods A mixed methods study design was used. A COPD care algorithm was developed based on the Australasian guidelines, COPDX. COPD participants were consecutively recruited from an outer metropolitan hospital’s respiratory clinic. Participants attended for follow up visits at 5 and 10?months to ascertain clinical status, algorithm compliance and to review and revise management recommendations. The intervention was conducted using existing resources, involving collaboration with general practice and the publicly-funded local chronic disease management programme (Medicare Local). Stakeholders provided qualitative feedback about the intervention in terms of feasibility, acceptability and barriers via structured and semi-structured interviews. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative thematic analysis to identify key concepts and themes. Results The study protocol was abandoned prematurely due to clear lack of feasibility. Of 12 participants, 4 withdrew and none completed pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). The main reasons for non-participation or study withdrawal related to reluctance to attend PR (6 of 16) and the burden of increased appointments (4 of 16). PR conflicted with employment hours, which presented problems for some participants. Similarly, themes that emerged from qualitative data indicate healthcare provider perception of deficiencies in funding (for infrastructure and staffing). Health literacy, motivation, organisation and functional impairment were issues for patients. Conclusions Available data from this small pilot provided valuable insights to inform future design and implementation strategies. Delivering structured team-based care to COPD patients presents challenges. In addition to enhancing health resources for engaging COPD patients, a focus on health literacy and improving health service access, including colocalisation and access outside business hours, may be required. Trial Registration ACTRN12616000342415 ; 16/03/2016.
机译:背景技术慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)被认为是一种多系统疾病,其中合并症是主要特征。 COPD指南建议对相关合并症进行整体评估和管理,但是关于如何最好地实现这一目标的信息有限。这项前瞻性研究旨在探讨利益相关者(包括患者和医疗团队)对于在团队合作中改善COPD患者健康状况的可行性,可接受性和障碍,以协作,多学科团队为基础的护理干预措施('TEAMcare')。当地医院门诊诊所的环境。方法采用混合方法研究设计。根据澳大利亚指南COPDX,开发了COPD护理算法。慢性阻塞性肺病的参与者是连续从一家大都市医院的呼吸诊所招募的。参与者参加了为期5个月和10个月的随访,以确定临床状况,算法依从性并审查和修订管理建议。干预是利用现有资源进行的,涉及与一般实践和公共资助的地方慢性病管理计划(Medicare Local)的合作。利益相关者通过结构化和半结构化访谈在可行性,可接受性和障碍方面提供了有关干预措施的定性反馈。记录所有访谈,逐字记录,并使用定性主题分析进行分析,以识别关键概念和主题。结果由于明显缺乏可行性,该研究方案被提前放弃。在12名参与者中,有4名退出了,没有一人完成肺部康复(PR)。不参加或退出研究的主要原因与不愿参加公关(16人中的6人)和增加任命的负担(16人中的4人)有关。公关与工作时间冲突,这给一些参与者带来了麻烦。同样,从定性数据中得出的主题表明医疗保健提供者对资金短缺(用于基础设施和人员配备)的看法。健康素养,动机,组织和功能障碍是患者的问题。结论来自这个小型试验的可用数据提供了宝贵的见解,可为将来的设计和实施策略提供参考。为COPD患者提供基于团队的结构化护理面临挑战。除了增加健康资源以吸引COPD患者外,可能还需要关注健康素养和改善健康服务的获取,包括在工作时间以外进行共本地化和获取服务。试用注册ACTRN12616000342415; 2016年3月16日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号