首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >A survey tool for measuring evidence-based decision making capacity in public health agencies
【24h】

A survey tool for measuring evidence-based decision making capacity in public health agencies

机译:一种用于测量公共卫生机构基于证据的决策能力的调查工具

获取原文
       

摘要

Background While increasing attention is placed on using evidence-based decision making (EBDM) to improve public health, there is little research assessing the current EBDM capacity of the public health workforce. Public health agencies serve a wide range of populations with varying levels of resources. Our survey tool allows an individual agency to collect data that reflects its unique workforce. Methods Health department leaders and academic researchers collaboratively developed and conducted cross-sectional surveys in Kansas and Mississippi (USA) to assess EBDM capacity. Surveys were delivered to state- and local-level practitioners and community partners working in chronic disease control and prevention. The core component of the surveys was adopted from a previously tested instrument and measured gaps (importance versus availability) in competencies for EBDM in chronic disease. Other survey questions addressed expectations and incentives for using EBDM, self-efficacy in three EBDM skills, and estimates of EBDM within the agency. Results In both states, participants identified communication with policymakers, use of economic evaluation, and translation of research to practice as top competency gaps. Self-efficacy in developing evidence-based chronic disease control programs was lower than in finding or using data. Public health practitioners estimated that approximately two-thirds of programs in their agency were evidence-based. Mississippi participants indicated that health department leaders' expectations for the use of EBDM was approximately twice that of co-workers' expectations and that the use of EBDM could be increased with training and leadership prioritization. Conclusions The assessment of EBDM capacity in Kansas and Mississippi built upon previous nationwide findings to identify top gaps in core competencies for EBDM in chronic disease and to estimate a percentage of programs in U.S. health departments that are evidence-based. The survey can serve as a valuable tool for other health departments and non-governmental organizations to assess EBDM capacity within their own workforce and to assist in the identification of approaches that will enhance the uptake of EBDM processes in public health programming and policymaking. Localized survey findings can provide direction for focusing workforce training programs and can indicate the types of incentives and policies that could affect the culture of EBDM in the workplace.
机译:背景技术虽然越来越多的人关注使用循证决策(EBDM)来改善公共卫生,但很少有研究评估当前公共卫生工作人员的EBDM能力。公共卫生机构以不同的资源水平为广泛的人群提供服务。我们的调查工具允许单个机构收集反映其独特劳动力的数据。方法卫生部门负责人和学术研究人员在美国堪萨斯州和密西西比州合作开发并进行了横断面调查,以评估EBDM的能力。调查已交付给从事慢性病控制和预防工作的州和地方级从业人员以及社区合作伙伴。调查的核心部分是从先前测试过的仪器中采用的,并测量了慢性疾病中EBDM能力的差距(重要性与可用性)。其他调查问题涉及使用EBDM的期望和动机,三种EBDM技能的自我效能感以及机构内部对EBDM的估计。结果在这两个州,参与者都认为与政策制定者的沟通,使用经济评估以及将研究成果转化为实践是最大的能力差距。在开发基于证据的慢性疾病控制程序中的自我效能要低于发现或使用数据的自我效能。公共卫生从业人员估计,他们机构中大约三分之二的计划都是基于证据的。密西西比州的参与者指出,卫生部门领导人对使用EBDM的期望大约是同事期望的两倍,并且可以通过培训和领导优先级提高EBDM的使用。结论对堪萨斯州和密西西比州的EBDM能力的评估基于先前在全国范围内的发现,以确定慢性疾病EBDM核心能力的主要差距,并估计美国卫生部门基于证据的计划的百分比。该调查可作为其他卫生部门和非政府组织评估其自身员工队伍中EBDM能力的宝贵工具,并有助于确定可在公共卫生规划和决策中增强EBDM流程采用率的方法。本地化的调查结果可以为集中劳动力培训计划提供指导,并可以指示可能影响工作场所EBDM文化的激励措施和政策的类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号