...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Fostering participation of general practitioners in integrated health services networks: incentives, barriers, and guidelines
【24h】

Fostering participation of general practitioners in integrated health services networks: incentives, barriers, and guidelines

机译:促进全科医生参与综合卫生服务网络:激励措施,障碍和准则

获取原文
           

摘要

Background While the active participation of general practitioners (GPs) in integrated health services networks (IHSNs) plays a critical role in their success, little is known about the incentives and barriers to their actual participation. Methods Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and a mail survey with GPs enrolled in SIPA (system of integrated care for older persons) at 2 sites in Montreal. A total of 61 GPs completed the questionnaire, from which 22 were randomly selected for the qualitative study, with active and non-active participation in the IHSN. Results The key themes associated with GP participation were clinician characteristics, consequences perceived at the outset, the SIPA implementation process, relationships with the SIPA team and professional consequences. The incentive factors reported were collaborative practices, high rates of elderly and SIPA patients in their clienteles, concerns about SIPA, the selection of frail elderly patients, close relationships with the case manager, the perceived efficacy of SIPA, and improved professional practices. Barriers to GP participation included high expectations, GP recruitment, lack of information on SIPA, difficult relationships with SIPA geriatricians and deterioration of physician-patient relationships. Four profiles of participation were identified: 2 groups of participants active in SIPA and 2 groups of participants not active in SIPA. The active GPs were familiar with collaborative practices, had higher IHSN patient rates, expressed more concerns than expectations, reported satisfactory relationships with case managers and perceived the efficacy of SIPA. Both active and non-active GPs reported quality care in the IHSN and improved professional practice. Conclusion Throughout the implementation process, the participation of GPs in an IHSN depends on numerous professional (clinician characteristics) and organizational factors (GP recruitment, relationships with case managers). Our study provides guiding principles for establishing future integrated models of care. It suggests practical guidelines to support the active participation of GPs in these networks such as physicians with collaborative practices, recruitment of significant number of patients per physicians, the information provided and the accompaniment by geriatricians.
机译:背景尽管全科医生(GPs)积极参与综合医疗服务网络(IHSN)对其成功至关重要,但对其实际参与的动机和障碍知之甚少。方法通过半结构化访谈和邮件调查收集了数据,并在蒙特利尔的2个地点注册了SIPA(老年人综合护理系统)的全科医生。共有61名GP完成问卷,从中随机选择22名进行定性研究,并积极和非积极地参与了IHSN。结果与全科医生参与有关的关键主题是临床医生的特征,一开始就意识到的后果,SIPA实施过程,与SIPA团队的关系以及专业后果。所报告的激励因素包括协作实践,老年患者和SIPA患者在客户群中的高比率,对SIPA的担忧,衰弱的老年患者的选择,与病例管理员的密切关系,SIPA的感知效率以及专业实践的改善。全科医生参与的障碍包括期望值高,全科医生招聘,缺乏关于SIPA的信息,与SIPA老年医生的关系困难以及医患关系的恶化。确定了四种参与方式:2组参加SIPA的参与者和2组未参加SIPA的参与者。活跃的全科医生熟悉协作实践,提高了IHSN的患者发病率,表达了超出预期的担忧,并报告了与病例管理员的满意关系,并意识到了SIPA的有效性。活跃和不活跃的全科医生都报告了IHSN中的优质护理并改善了专业实践。结论在整个实施过程中,全科医生参与IHSN的过程取决于众多专业人士(临床医生的特征)和组织因素(全科医生的招聘,与案件经理的关系)。我们的研究为建立未来的综合护理模型提供了指导原则。它提出了一些实用的指南来支持GP积极参与这些网络,例如具有协作实践的医生,每位医生招募大量患者,所提供的信息以及老年医生的陪伴。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号